Place vs. Node Transit: Planning Policies Revisited

Doina Olaru, Simon Moncrieff, Gary McCarney, Yuchao Sun, Tristan Reed, Cate Pattison, Brett Smith, Sharon Biermann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A core contemporary planning approach is the promotion of transit-oriented developments (TODs) and in recent times cities have committed substantial financial investment to encourage sustainable precincts around public transport. Evaluation of the success of TODs is key for continuing the planning efforts. A frequently applied framework for characterizing TODs draws on Bertolini's Node-Place (N-P) model, enriched through application in various contexts. We offer here an extension to the N-P model, using a case study in a low-density city, Perth, Western Australia. A typology of railway stations is developed using 43 indicators and then linear models are applied to ascertain the association between patronage and station precinct features. The results show that various types of measures are required to increase public transport ridership for the four clusters that emerged from the analysis. Density alone does not lead to increased use of public transport; it must be associated with city-wide accessibility, as well as access/egress to and from the station.

Original languageEnglish
Article number477
Number of pages14
JournalSustainability
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2019

Cite this

Olaru, Doina ; Moncrieff, Simon ; McCarney, Gary ; Sun, Yuchao ; Reed, Tristan ; Pattison, Cate ; Smith, Brett ; Biermann, Sharon. / Place vs. Node Transit : Planning Policies Revisited. In: Sustainability. 2019 ; Vol. 11, No. 2.
@article{66391eb58b83491ca22ba96e72c109bb,
title = "Place vs. Node Transit: Planning Policies Revisited",
abstract = "A core contemporary planning approach is the promotion of transit-oriented developments (TODs) and in recent times cities have committed substantial financial investment to encourage sustainable precincts around public transport. Evaluation of the success of TODs is key for continuing the planning efforts. A frequently applied framework for characterizing TODs draws on Bertolini's Node-Place (N-P) model, enriched through application in various contexts. We offer here an extension to the N-P model, using a case study in a low-density city, Perth, Western Australia. A typology of railway stations is developed using 43 indicators and then linear models are applied to ascertain the association between patronage and station precinct features. The results show that various types of measures are required to increase public transport ridership for the four clusters that emerged from the analysis. Density alone does not lead to increased use of public transport; it must be associated with city-wide accessibility, as well as access/egress to and from the station.",
keywords = "node, place, transit-oriented developments, land-use and transport planning, ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT, LAND-USE, BUILT ENVIRONMENTS, STATION AREAS, MODEL, INTEGRATION, DENSITY, TRAVEL, TRANSPORT, DIVERSITY",
author = "Doina Olaru and Simon Moncrieff and Gary McCarney and Yuchao Sun and Tristan Reed and Cate Pattison and Brett Smith and Sharon Biermann",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.3390/su11020477",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Sustainability (Switzerland)",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "2",

}

Place vs. Node Transit : Planning Policies Revisited. / Olaru, Doina; Moncrieff, Simon; McCarney, Gary; Sun, Yuchao; Reed, Tristan; Pattison, Cate; Smith, Brett; Biermann, Sharon.

In: Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 2, 477, 02.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Place vs. Node Transit

T2 - Planning Policies Revisited

AU - Olaru, Doina

AU - Moncrieff, Simon

AU - McCarney, Gary

AU - Sun, Yuchao

AU - Reed, Tristan

AU - Pattison, Cate

AU - Smith, Brett

AU - Biermann, Sharon

PY - 2019/1/2

Y1 - 2019/1/2

N2 - A core contemporary planning approach is the promotion of transit-oriented developments (TODs) and in recent times cities have committed substantial financial investment to encourage sustainable precincts around public transport. Evaluation of the success of TODs is key for continuing the planning efforts. A frequently applied framework for characterizing TODs draws on Bertolini's Node-Place (N-P) model, enriched through application in various contexts. We offer here an extension to the N-P model, using a case study in a low-density city, Perth, Western Australia. A typology of railway stations is developed using 43 indicators and then linear models are applied to ascertain the association between patronage and station precinct features. The results show that various types of measures are required to increase public transport ridership for the four clusters that emerged from the analysis. Density alone does not lead to increased use of public transport; it must be associated with city-wide accessibility, as well as access/egress to and from the station.

AB - A core contemporary planning approach is the promotion of transit-oriented developments (TODs) and in recent times cities have committed substantial financial investment to encourage sustainable precincts around public transport. Evaluation of the success of TODs is key for continuing the planning efforts. A frequently applied framework for characterizing TODs draws on Bertolini's Node-Place (N-P) model, enriched through application in various contexts. We offer here an extension to the N-P model, using a case study in a low-density city, Perth, Western Australia. A typology of railway stations is developed using 43 indicators and then linear models are applied to ascertain the association between patronage and station precinct features. The results show that various types of measures are required to increase public transport ridership for the four clusters that emerged from the analysis. Density alone does not lead to increased use of public transport; it must be associated with city-wide accessibility, as well as access/egress to and from the station.

KW - node

KW - place

KW - transit-oriented developments

KW - land-use and transport planning

KW - ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT

KW - LAND-USE

KW - BUILT ENVIRONMENTS

KW - STATION AREAS

KW - MODEL

KW - INTEGRATION

KW - DENSITY

KW - TRAVEL

KW - TRANSPORT

KW - DIVERSITY

U2 - 10.3390/su11020477

DO - 10.3390/su11020477

M3 - Article

VL - 11

JO - Sustainability (Switzerland)

JF - Sustainability (Switzerland)

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 2

M1 - 477

ER -

Olaru D, Moncrieff S, McCarney G, Sun Y, Reed T, Pattison C et al. Place vs. Node Transit: Planning Policies Revisited. Sustainability. 2019 Jan 2;11(2). 477. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020477