Physical activity benefits from taking your dog to the park

Jenny Veitch, Hayley Christian, Alison Carver, Jo Salmon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Dog walking is an important source of physical activity and local parks are an important setting for dog walking. Park visitation characteristics of dog walkers is largely unknown. Using data from self- and proxy-report surveys completed by adults living near two parks in Melbourne, Australia in April-May 2013, this study examined the frequency and duration of park visits and intensity and duration of park-based physical activity among adults and children who visited parks with a dog compared with those who visited parks without a dog. The sample included 1187 adults (49 years, SD:13.3) and 755 children (9 years, SD:3.6). Adults (OR = 2.71, 95% CI:1.99, 3.70) and children (OR = 1.63, 95% CI:1.09, 2.44) were more likely to visit parks more frequently; adults were less likely to visit for a longer duration on weekends (OR = 0.58, 95% CI:0.43, 0.77); and children were less likely to spend more time being active (−9.22, 95% CI:−16.74, −1.70) when visiting the park with a dog versus without a dog. Adults who visited with a dog were also less likely to spend 1+ hours in the park on weekdays than <30 min (RRR = 0.53, 95% CI:0.33, 0.85) and more likely to engage in moderate than sitting/light-intensity activity (RRR = 2.30, 95% CI:1.69, 3.15). Children who visited with a dog were less likely to engage in vigorous than sitting/light-intensity activity (RRR = 0.39, 95% CI:0.16, 0.94). Adults and children who visit parks with a dog are more frequent park users therefore park access, design and amenity should support dog walkers and their engagement in physical activity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)173-179
Number of pages7
JournalLandscape and Urban Planning
Volume185
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019

Fingerprint

physical activity
walking
light intensity
dog
amenity

Cite this

Veitch, Jenny ; Christian, Hayley ; Carver, Alison ; Salmon, Jo. / Physical activity benefits from taking your dog to the park. In: Landscape and Urban Planning. 2019 ; Vol. 185. pp. 173-179.
@article{687e4189b24442b8a8de5d16d249488e,
title = "Physical activity benefits from taking your dog to the park",
abstract = "Dog walking is an important source of physical activity and local parks are an important setting for dog walking. Park visitation characteristics of dog walkers is largely unknown. Using data from self- and proxy-report surveys completed by adults living near two parks in Melbourne, Australia in April-May 2013, this study examined the frequency and duration of park visits and intensity and duration of park-based physical activity among adults and children who visited parks with a dog compared with those who visited parks without a dog. The sample included 1187 adults (49 years, SD:13.3) and 755 children (9 years, SD:3.6). Adults (OR = 2.71, 95{\%} CI:1.99, 3.70) and children (OR = 1.63, 95{\%} CI:1.09, 2.44) were more likely to visit parks more frequently; adults were less likely to visit for a longer duration on weekends (OR = 0.58, 95{\%} CI:0.43, 0.77); and children were less likely to spend more time being active (−9.22, 95{\%} CI:−16.74, −1.70) when visiting the park with a dog versus without a dog. Adults who visited with a dog were also less likely to spend 1+ hours in the park on weekdays than <30 min (RRR = 0.53, 95{\%} CI:0.33, 0.85) and more likely to engage in moderate than sitting/light-intensity activity (RRR = 2.30, 95{\%} CI:1.69, 3.15). Children who visited with a dog were less likely to engage in vigorous than sitting/light-intensity activity (RRR = 0.39, 95{\%} CI:0.16, 0.94). Adults and children who visit parks with a dog are more frequent park users therefore park access, design and amenity should support dog walkers and their engagement in physical activity.",
author = "Jenny Veitch and Hayley Christian and Alison Carver and Jo Salmon",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.013",
language = "English",
volume = "185",
pages = "173--179",
journal = "Landscape and Urban Planning",
issn = "0169-2046",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Physical activity benefits from taking your dog to the park. / Veitch, Jenny; Christian, Hayley; Carver, Alison; Salmon, Jo.

In: Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 185, 01.05.2019, p. 173-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physical activity benefits from taking your dog to the park

AU - Veitch, Jenny

AU - Christian, Hayley

AU - Carver, Alison

AU - Salmon, Jo

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Dog walking is an important source of physical activity and local parks are an important setting for dog walking. Park visitation characteristics of dog walkers is largely unknown. Using data from self- and proxy-report surveys completed by adults living near two parks in Melbourne, Australia in April-May 2013, this study examined the frequency and duration of park visits and intensity and duration of park-based physical activity among adults and children who visited parks with a dog compared with those who visited parks without a dog. The sample included 1187 adults (49 years, SD:13.3) and 755 children (9 years, SD:3.6). Adults (OR = 2.71, 95% CI:1.99, 3.70) and children (OR = 1.63, 95% CI:1.09, 2.44) were more likely to visit parks more frequently; adults were less likely to visit for a longer duration on weekends (OR = 0.58, 95% CI:0.43, 0.77); and children were less likely to spend more time being active (−9.22, 95% CI:−16.74, −1.70) when visiting the park with a dog versus without a dog. Adults who visited with a dog were also less likely to spend 1+ hours in the park on weekdays than <30 min (RRR = 0.53, 95% CI:0.33, 0.85) and more likely to engage in moderate than sitting/light-intensity activity (RRR = 2.30, 95% CI:1.69, 3.15). Children who visited with a dog were less likely to engage in vigorous than sitting/light-intensity activity (RRR = 0.39, 95% CI:0.16, 0.94). Adults and children who visit parks with a dog are more frequent park users therefore park access, design and amenity should support dog walkers and their engagement in physical activity.

AB - Dog walking is an important source of physical activity and local parks are an important setting for dog walking. Park visitation characteristics of dog walkers is largely unknown. Using data from self- and proxy-report surveys completed by adults living near two parks in Melbourne, Australia in April-May 2013, this study examined the frequency and duration of park visits and intensity and duration of park-based physical activity among adults and children who visited parks with a dog compared with those who visited parks without a dog. The sample included 1187 adults (49 years, SD:13.3) and 755 children (9 years, SD:3.6). Adults (OR = 2.71, 95% CI:1.99, 3.70) and children (OR = 1.63, 95% CI:1.09, 2.44) were more likely to visit parks more frequently; adults were less likely to visit for a longer duration on weekends (OR = 0.58, 95% CI:0.43, 0.77); and children were less likely to spend more time being active (−9.22, 95% CI:−16.74, −1.70) when visiting the park with a dog versus without a dog. Adults who visited with a dog were also less likely to spend 1+ hours in the park on weekdays than <30 min (RRR = 0.53, 95% CI:0.33, 0.85) and more likely to engage in moderate than sitting/light-intensity activity (RRR = 2.30, 95% CI:1.69, 3.15). Children who visited with a dog were less likely to engage in vigorous than sitting/light-intensity activity (RRR = 0.39, 95% CI:0.16, 0.94). Adults and children who visit parks with a dog are more frequent park users therefore park access, design and amenity should support dog walkers and their engagement in physical activity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061539468&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.013

DO - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.013

M3 - Article

VL - 185

SP - 173

EP - 179

JO - Landscape and Urban Planning

JF - Landscape and Urban Planning

SN - 0169-2046

ER -