Photovoice and refugee research: The case for a ‘layers’ versus ‘labels’ approach to vulnerability

Louise Humpage, Farida Fozdar, Jay Marlowe, Lisa Hartley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)


‘Vulnerability’ is a key concept used to understand the ethical implications of conducting refugee-focused research. This case study illustrates the need to follow Luna’s (2009) call for a shift from a ‘labels’ to a ‘layers’ approach to vulnerability by analysing how two university ethics committees responded to issues of informed consent in two similar refugee research projects using the PhotoVoice method. The following commentary argues that, when driven by a research governance regime, ethics review risks viewing refugees through a static label of vulnerability, negatively affecting research viability and data quality. In contrast, a layers approach opens space for understanding the potential for vulnerability amongst refugee research participants while supporting PhotoVoice’s goals of empowerment and facilitating agency. The case study highlights the need for national-level ethics statements that encourage a more flexible approach within research institutions. © The Author(s) 2019.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalResearch Ethics
Issue number3-4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2019


Dive into the research topics of 'Photovoice and refugee research: The case for a ‘layers’ versus ‘labels’ approach to vulnerability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this