TY - JOUR
T1 - Phenotypic detection of metallo-β-lactamase in imipenem-resistant pseudomonas aeruginosa
AU - Khosravi, Yalda
AU - Loke, Mun Fai
AU - Chua, Eng Guan
AU - Tay, Sun Tee
AU - Vadivelu, Jamuna
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Carbapenems are the primary choice of treatment for severe Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. However, the emergence of carbapenem resistance due to the production of metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) is of global concern. In this study, 90 imipenem- (IPM- or IP-) resistant P. aeruginosa (IRPA) isolates, including 32 previously tested positive and genotyped for MBL genes by PCR, were subjected to double-disk synergy test (DDST), combined disk test (CDT), and imipenem/imipenem-inhibitor (IP/IPI) E-test to evaluate their MBLs detection capability. All three methods were shown to have a sensitivity of 100%. However, DDST was the most specific of the three (96.6%), followed by IP/IPI E-test interpreted based on the single criteria of IP/IPI ≥ 8 as positive (62.1), and CDT was the least specific (43.1). Based on the data from this evaluation, we propose that only IRPA with IP MIC > 16 μg/mL and IP/IPI ≥ 8 by IP/IPI E-test should be taken as positive for MBL activity. With the new dual interpretation criteria, the MBL IP/IPI E-test was shown to achieve 100 sensitivity as well as specificity for the IRPA in this study. Therefore, the IP/IPI E-test is a viable alternative phenotypic assay to detect MBL production in IRPA in our population in circumstances where PCR detection is not a feasible option.
AB - Carbapenems are the primary choice of treatment for severe Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. However, the emergence of carbapenem resistance due to the production of metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) is of global concern. In this study, 90 imipenem- (IPM- or IP-) resistant P. aeruginosa (IRPA) isolates, including 32 previously tested positive and genotyped for MBL genes by PCR, were subjected to double-disk synergy test (DDST), combined disk test (CDT), and imipenem/imipenem-inhibitor (IP/IPI) E-test to evaluate their MBLs detection capability. All three methods were shown to have a sensitivity of 100%. However, DDST was the most specific of the three (96.6%), followed by IP/IPI E-test interpreted based on the single criteria of IP/IPI ≥ 8 as positive (62.1), and CDT was the least specific (43.1). Based on the data from this evaluation, we propose that only IRPA with IP MIC > 16 μg/mL and IP/IPI ≥ 8 by IP/IPI E-test should be taken as positive for MBL activity. With the new dual interpretation criteria, the MBL IP/IPI E-test was shown to achieve 100 sensitivity as well as specificity for the IRPA in this study. Therefore, the IP/IPI E-test is a viable alternative phenotypic assay to detect MBL production in IRPA in our population in circumstances where PCR detection is not a feasible option.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863750405&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1100/2012/654939
DO - 10.1100/2012/654939
M3 - Article
C2 - 22792048
AN - SCOPUS:84863750405
SN - 1537-744X
VL - 2012
JO - The Scientific World Journal
JF - The Scientific World Journal
M1 - 654939
ER -