Perspectives on early health economic evaluations of RNA therapies targeted at lipoprotein(a)

Purpose of reviewEarly health economic evaluations of new medications are useful, as they consider the implications for health services.We reviewed recent literature on expected clinical outcomes of lowering of elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in secondary prevention, which is essential information on effectiveness for economic evaluations.We reviewed a recent early economic evaluation of RNA therapies targeted at Lp(a).Purpose of reviewEarly health economic evaluations of new medications are useful, as they consider the implications for health services.We reviewed recent literature on expected clinical outcomes of lowering of elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in secondary prevention, which is essential information on effectiveness for economic evaluations.We reviewed a recent early economic evaluation of RNA therapies targeted at Lp(a).Purpose of reviewEarly health economic evaluations of new medications are useful, as they consider the implications for health services.We reviewed recent literature on expected clinical outcomes of lowering of elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in secondary prevention, which is essential information on effectiveness for economic evaluations.We reviewed a recent early economic evaluation of RNA therapies targeted at Lp(a).Recent findingsRNA-based therapies, if approved, would likely be used initially in adults with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and very high Lp(a). Adults with ASCVD have high absolute risk of recurrent events and elevated Lp(a) serves as a risk-enhancing factor.Potent lowering of Lp(a) in secondary prevention may be associated with significant relative risk reductions of coronary heart disease or ASCVD events; this needs confirmation in currently ongoing and future clinical trials.One economic evaluation has estimated the value of olpasiran and pelacarsen, at various willingness-to-pay thresholds, compared with standard-of-care secondary prevention.Recent findingsRNA-based therapies, if approved, would likely be used initially in adults with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and very high Lp(a). Adults with ASCVD have high absolute risk of recurrent events and elevated Lp(a) serves as a risk-enhancing factor.Potent lowering of Lp(a) in secondary prevention may be associated with significant relative risk reductions of coronary heart disease or ASCVD events; this needs confirmation in currently ongoing and future clinical trials.One economic evaluation has estimated the value of olpasiran and pelacarsen, at various willingness-to-pay thresholds, compared with standard-of-care secondary prevention.Recent findingsRNA-based therapies, if approved, would likely be used initially in adults with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and very high Lp(a). Adults with ASCVD have high absolute risk of recurrent events and elevated Lp(a) serves as a risk-enhancing factor.Potent lowering of Lp(a) in secondary prevention may be associated with significant relative risk reductions of coronary heart disease or ASCVD events; this needs confirmation in currently ongoing and future clinical trials.One economic evaluation has estimated the value of olpasiran and pelacarsen, at various willingness-to-pay thresholds, compared with standard-of-care secondary prevention.SummaryEarly economic evaluations estimate longer-term clinical benefits and cost consequences associated with new medications.Existing casual evidence of Lp(a) and cardiovascular disease can be used in early economic evaluations as best available evidence, while awaiting results from major cardiovascular outcomes trials.SummaryEarly economic evaluations estimate longer-term clinical benefits and cost consequences associated with new medications.Existing casual evidence of Lp(a) and cardiovascular disease can be used in early economic evaluations as best available evidence, while awaiting results from major cardiovascular outcomes trials.