Personal experience in doctor and patient decision making: From psychology to medicine

Simon Y.W. Li, Tim Rakow, Ben R. Newell

Research output: Contribution to journalShort surveypeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Traditional decision research shows that when people are told the probability of a rare event (e.g. the chance of side effects), they generally treat this event as if it were more likely than its objective probability (overweighting). In contrast, recent studies indicate that when outcomes are experienced firsthand, people tend to underweight the probability of rare events. In this paper, we suggest that the distinction between described and experienced information can play a significant role in shared decision making, and can provide a plausible explanation for some discrepancies between the perspectives of doctors and patients. We highlight some of the advantages and disadvantages of experiential and description-based information, and how knowledge of these might be used to improve risk communication.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)993-995
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Volume15
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Personal experience in doctor and patient decision making: From psychology to medicine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this