Peritoneal dialysis practice in Australia and New Zealand: A call to sustain the action

David W. Mudge, Neil Boudville, Fiona G. Brown, Philip Clayton, Michelle Duddington, Stephen Holt, David W. Johnson, Matthew Jose, Walaa Saweirs, Kamal Sud, David Voss, Rowan Walker

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper updates a previous ‘Call to Action’ paper (Nephrology 2011; 16: 19–29) that reviewed key outcome data for Australian and New Zealand peritoneal dialysis patients and made recommendations to improve care. Since its publication, peritonitis rates have improved significantly, although they have plateaued more recently. Peritoneal dialysis patient and technique survival in Australian and New Zealand have also improved, with a reduction in the proportion of technique failures attributed to ‘social reasons’. Despite these improvements, technique survival rates overall remain lower than in many other parts of the world. This update includes additional practical recommendations based on published evidence and emerging initiatives to further improve outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)535-546
Number of pages12
JournalNephrology
Volume21
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2016

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Peritoneal dialysis practice in Australia and New Zealand: A call to sustain the action'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Mudge, D. W., Boudville, N., Brown, F. G., Clayton, P., Duddington, M., Holt, S., Johnson, D. W., Jose, M., Saweirs, W., Sud, K., Voss, D., & Walker, R. (2016). Peritoneal dialysis practice in Australia and New Zealand: A call to sustain the action. Nephrology, 21(7), 535-546. https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.12731