TY - JOUR
T1 - Periorbital temperature responses to natural air temperature variation in wild birds
AU - Soravia, Camilla
AU - Ashton, Benjamin J.
AU - Ridley, Amanda R.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by the Australian Government Research Training Program through a scholarship awarded to Camilla Soravia at The University of Western Australia . This work was also supported by the Rotary Club of Melville and the Postgraduate Student Association at the University of Western Australia through two awards to Camilla Soravia. The Kuruman River Reserve research station, where this study population was located, was financed by the European Research Council (Research Grant Nos 294494 and 742808 to Tim Clutton-Brock since July 1, 2012) and the Human Frontier Science Program (funding reference RGP0051/2017 ), the Universities of Cambridge and Zurich and MAVA foundation , and received logistic support by the Mammal Research Institute , University of Pretoria .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - With global temperatures rapidly increasing, biologists require tools to assess how wild animals are responding to heat. Thermal imaging of the eye region offers a potential non-invasive alternative to traditional techniques to study thermoregulation and stress responses in wild animals. However, we currently have a poor understanding of how the temperature of the eye region is regulated under increasing temperature and whether this regulation differs among individuals. Here, we use thermal imaging to repeatedly measure the maximum temperature of the eye region (periorbital temperature) in 42 wild pied babblers (Turdoides bicolor) under natural air temperatures ranging from 14.3 to 42.5 °C. Our aim was to determine the relationship between periorbital temperature and air temperature, whether this relationship is repeatable, and whether it differs according to individual attributes. Periorbital temperature showed a non-linear increase with air temperature, becoming independent of air temperature above 38 °C. Above 38 °C, periorbital temperature was not explained by any individual attributes. Below 38 °C, periorbital temperature increased more steeply in individuals with low body mass and it was lower in older compared to younger females. However, the effect of these individual attributes was small compared to the effect of wind speed, air temperature and head tilt. Additionally, the repeatability of individual periorbital temperature was low (R < 0.25) and non-significant both below and above 38 °C. Our findings warrant caution in the use of periorbital temperature to infer individual thermoregulatory responses to increasing temperatures, especially in the wild, where control over confounding non-physiological factors is limited.
AB - With global temperatures rapidly increasing, biologists require tools to assess how wild animals are responding to heat. Thermal imaging of the eye region offers a potential non-invasive alternative to traditional techniques to study thermoregulation and stress responses in wild animals. However, we currently have a poor understanding of how the temperature of the eye region is regulated under increasing temperature and whether this regulation differs among individuals. Here, we use thermal imaging to repeatedly measure the maximum temperature of the eye region (periorbital temperature) in 42 wild pied babblers (Turdoides bicolor) under natural air temperatures ranging from 14.3 to 42.5 °C. Our aim was to determine the relationship between periorbital temperature and air temperature, whether this relationship is repeatable, and whether it differs according to individual attributes. Periorbital temperature showed a non-linear increase with air temperature, becoming independent of air temperature above 38 °C. Above 38 °C, periorbital temperature was not explained by any individual attributes. Below 38 °C, periorbital temperature increased more steeply in individuals with low body mass and it was lower in older compared to younger females. However, the effect of these individual attributes was small compared to the effect of wind speed, air temperature and head tilt. Additionally, the repeatability of individual periorbital temperature was low (R < 0.25) and non-significant both below and above 38 °C. Our findings warrant caution in the use of periorbital temperature to infer individual thermoregulatory responses to increasing temperatures, especially in the wild, where control over confounding non-physiological factors is limited.
KW - Climate change
KW - Heat stress
KW - Pied babbler
KW - Repeatability
KW - Thermography
KW - Thermoregulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137566523&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2022.103323
DO - 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2022.103323
M3 - Article
C2 - 36195398
AN - SCOPUS:85137566523
SN - 0306-4565
VL - 109
JO - Journal of Thermal Biology
JF - Journal of Thermal Biology
M1 - 103323
ER -