TY - JOUR
T1 - Patients’ perspectives and experiences concerning barriers to accessing information about bilateral prophylactic mastectomy
AU - Glassey, Rachael
AU - O'Connor, Moira
AU - Ives, Angela
AU - Saunders, Christobel
AU - kConFab Investigators, Investigators
AU - O'Sullivan, Sarah
AU - Hardcastle, Sarah J.
PY - 2018/8/1
Y1 - 2018/8/1
N2 - Purpose: To explore the barriers and experiences of accessing information for women who have received genetic risk assessment/testing results for breast cancer (BC) and are considering a bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM) and, exploring participants’ preferences concerning information and support needs. Methods: A qualitative retrospective study guided by interpretative phenomenological analysis was utilised. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with forty-six women who were either considering BPM or had already undergone the surgery. Results: Three themes identified barriers to accessing information; difficulties accessing information, inconsistent information and clinical focus/medicalized information. A fourth theme - preferences of information and support needs, identified three subthemes; these were, psychological support, clearly defined processes and photos of mastectomies/reconstruction surgeries. Conclusions: Barriers to accessing information appeared to be widespread. A lack of integrated services contributed to inconsistent information, and medicalized terminology/clinical focus of consultations further complicated understanding. Preferences for information include clearly defined processes, so women know the pathways after confirmation of familial BC risk. Clinical implications include a multidisciplinary team approach, and a protocol that reflects current practice.
AB - Purpose: To explore the barriers and experiences of accessing information for women who have received genetic risk assessment/testing results for breast cancer (BC) and are considering a bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM) and, exploring participants’ preferences concerning information and support needs. Methods: A qualitative retrospective study guided by interpretative phenomenological analysis was utilised. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with forty-six women who were either considering BPM or had already undergone the surgery. Results: Three themes identified barriers to accessing information; difficulties accessing information, inconsistent information and clinical focus/medicalized information. A fourth theme - preferences of information and support needs, identified three subthemes; these were, psychological support, clearly defined processes and photos of mastectomies/reconstruction surgeries. Conclusions: Barriers to accessing information appeared to be widespread. A lack of integrated services contributed to inconsistent information, and medicalized terminology/clinical focus of consultations further complicated understanding. Preferences for information include clearly defined processes, so women know the pathways after confirmation of familial BC risk. Clinical implications include a multidisciplinary team approach, and a protocol that reflects current practice.
KW - Information barriers
KW - Information needs
KW - Prophylactic mastectomy
KW - Support needs
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046726212&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.breast.2018.05.003
DO - 10.1016/j.breast.2018.05.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 29758504
AN - SCOPUS:85046726212
SN - 0960-9776
VL - 40
SP - 116
EP - 122
JO - BREAST
JF - BREAST
ER -