Patient perspectives on priorities for emergency medicine research: The PERSPEX study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the priorities for emergency medicine research of patients currently in an ED and to compare their priorities with those of ACEM researchers. Methods: A survey of current patients in the EDs of Royal Perth Hospital and Armadale Health Service. Patients gave their reason for presentation, suggested three important research priorities for emergency medicine and ranked their top 5 choices from a pre-specified list published by the ACEM researchers. Results were analysed using qualitative and quantitative research methods. Results: A total of 430 patients completed the survey, of which 218 were men (50.7%), with median age 44 years (interquartile range [IQR] 30-61years, range 18-92years). The top 5 priorities suggested by patients were cardiology, trauma, ED processes, mental health and haematology/oncology. The top 5 patient rankings of the ACEM researcher list were resuscitation, trauma, cardiology, infectious diseases and paediatrics. Older age groups tended to rank cardiology high, while trauma and resuscitation were ranked high among all age groups. There was moderate agreement between patients and ACEM researchers (ρ=0.51, P=0.03). Conclusions: The top 5 emergency medicine research priorities nominated by patients in ED were cardiology, trauma, ED processes, mental health and haematology/oncology, although many 'system priorities' were identified as well. These priorities were generally consistent with ACEM researchers, but patients also suggested alternative directions for future research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)228-235
JournalEMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2018

Fingerprint

Emergency Medicine
Research
Cardiology
Research Personnel
Wounds and Injuries
Hematology
Resuscitation
Mental Health
Age Groups
Qualitative Research
Health Services
Communicable Diseases
Pediatrics

Cite this

@article{f510408c935b4e1fa360b661cd741d5d,
title = "Patient perspectives on priorities for emergency medicine research: The PERSPEX study",
abstract = "Objectives: To determine the priorities for emergency medicine research of patients currently in an ED and to compare their priorities with those of ACEM researchers. Methods: A survey of current patients in the EDs of Royal Perth Hospital and Armadale Health Service. Patients gave their reason for presentation, suggested three important research priorities for emergency medicine and ranked their top 5 choices from a pre-specified list published by the ACEM researchers. Results were analysed using qualitative and quantitative research methods. Results: A total of 430 patients completed the survey, of which 218 were men (50.7{\%}), with median age 44 years (interquartile range [IQR] 30-61years, range 18-92years). The top 5 priorities suggested by patients were cardiology, trauma, ED processes, mental health and haematology/oncology. The top 5 patient rankings of the ACEM researcher list were resuscitation, trauma, cardiology, infectious diseases and paediatrics. Older age groups tended to rank cardiology high, while trauma and resuscitation were ranked high among all age groups. There was moderate agreement between patients and ACEM researchers (ρ=0.51, P=0.03). Conclusions: The top 5 emergency medicine research priorities nominated by patients in ED were cardiology, trauma, ED processes, mental health and haematology/oncology, although many 'system priorities' were identified as well. These priorities were generally consistent with ACEM researchers, but patients also suggested alternative directions for future research.",
keywords = "Emergency medicine, Patient engagement, Patient preference, Research priorities, Research techniques",
author = "Mclay, {Stuart Vb} and David Mccutcheon and Glenn Arendts and Macdonald, {Stephen P.J.} and Fatovich, {Daniel M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/1742-6723.12844",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "228--235",
journal = "Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1742-6723",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient perspectives on priorities for emergency medicine research

T2 - The PERSPEX study

AU - Mclay, Stuart Vb

AU - Mccutcheon, David

AU - Arendts, Glenn

AU - Macdonald, Stephen P.J.

AU - Fatovich, Daniel M.

PY - 2018/4

Y1 - 2018/4

N2 - Objectives: To determine the priorities for emergency medicine research of patients currently in an ED and to compare their priorities with those of ACEM researchers. Methods: A survey of current patients in the EDs of Royal Perth Hospital and Armadale Health Service. Patients gave their reason for presentation, suggested three important research priorities for emergency medicine and ranked their top 5 choices from a pre-specified list published by the ACEM researchers. Results were analysed using qualitative and quantitative research methods. Results: A total of 430 patients completed the survey, of which 218 were men (50.7%), with median age 44 years (interquartile range [IQR] 30-61years, range 18-92years). The top 5 priorities suggested by patients were cardiology, trauma, ED processes, mental health and haematology/oncology. The top 5 patient rankings of the ACEM researcher list were resuscitation, trauma, cardiology, infectious diseases and paediatrics. Older age groups tended to rank cardiology high, while trauma and resuscitation were ranked high among all age groups. There was moderate agreement between patients and ACEM researchers (ρ=0.51, P=0.03). Conclusions: The top 5 emergency medicine research priorities nominated by patients in ED were cardiology, trauma, ED processes, mental health and haematology/oncology, although many 'system priorities' were identified as well. These priorities were generally consistent with ACEM researchers, but patients also suggested alternative directions for future research.

AB - Objectives: To determine the priorities for emergency medicine research of patients currently in an ED and to compare their priorities with those of ACEM researchers. Methods: A survey of current patients in the EDs of Royal Perth Hospital and Armadale Health Service. Patients gave their reason for presentation, suggested three important research priorities for emergency medicine and ranked their top 5 choices from a pre-specified list published by the ACEM researchers. Results were analysed using qualitative and quantitative research methods. Results: A total of 430 patients completed the survey, of which 218 were men (50.7%), with median age 44 years (interquartile range [IQR] 30-61years, range 18-92years). The top 5 priorities suggested by patients were cardiology, trauma, ED processes, mental health and haematology/oncology. The top 5 patient rankings of the ACEM researcher list were resuscitation, trauma, cardiology, infectious diseases and paediatrics. Older age groups tended to rank cardiology high, while trauma and resuscitation were ranked high among all age groups. There was moderate agreement between patients and ACEM researchers (ρ=0.51, P=0.03). Conclusions: The top 5 emergency medicine research priorities nominated by patients in ED were cardiology, trauma, ED processes, mental health and haematology/oncology, although many 'system priorities' were identified as well. These priorities were generally consistent with ACEM researchers, but patients also suggested alternative directions for future research.

KW - Emergency medicine

KW - Patient engagement

KW - Patient preference

KW - Research priorities

KW - Research techniques

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030148430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1742-6723.12844

DO - 10.1111/1742-6723.12844

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 228

EP - 235

JO - Emergency Medicine

JF - Emergency Medicine

SN - 1742-6723

IS - 2

ER -