Partitioning the variation in stream fish assemblages within a spatio-temporal hierarchy

B. Stewart-Koster, M.J. Kennard, B.D. Harch, F. Sheldon, A.H. Arthington, Brad Pusey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)


This paper describes the relative influence of (i) landscape scale environmental and hydrological factors, (ii) local scale environmental conditions including recent flow history, and (iii) spatial effects (proximity of sites to one another), on the spatial and temporal variation in local freshwater fish assemblages in the Mary River, south-eastern Queensland, Australia. Using canonical correspondence analysis, each of the three sets of variables explained similar amounts of variation in fish assemblages (ranging from 44 to 52%). Variation in fish assemblages was partitioned into eight unique components: pure environmental, pure spatial, pure temporal, spatially structured environmental variation, temporally structured environmental variation, spatially structured temporal variation, the combined spatial/temporal component of environmental variation and unexplained variation. The total variation explained by these components was 65%. The combined spatial/temporal/environmental component explained the largest component (30%) of the total variation in fish assemblages, whereas pure environmental (6%), temporal (9%) and spatial (2%) effects were relatively unimportant. The high degree of intercorrelation between the three different groups of explanatory variables indicates that our understanding of the importance to fish assemblages of hydrological variation (often highlighted as the major structuring force in river systems) is dependent on the environmental context in which this role is examined.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)675-686
JournalMarine and Freshwater Research
Publication statusPublished - 2007


Dive into the research topics of 'Partitioning the variation in stream fish assemblages within a spatio-temporal hierarchy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this