Abstract
Multiple-choice items are used in large-scale assessments of mathematical achievement for secondary students in many countries. Research findings can be implemented to improve the quality of the items and hence increase the amount of information gathered about student learning from each item. One way to achieve this is to create items for which partial credit can be given when students select particular incorrect options. To improve the items in this way requires a critical analysis of how the items contribute to the measure of student achievement as well as extensive knowledge of the test construct.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | 40 years on: We are still learning! |
Subtitle of host publication | Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia |
Editors | A. Downton, S. Livy, J. Hall |
Place of Publication | Melbourne |
Publisher | Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia |
Pages | 117-124 |
Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Event | 40th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia - Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Duration: 2 Jul 2017 → 6 Jul 2017 https://custom.cvent.com/AC1461E6AC63400FB8AAA2E83F2C2C45/files/6e0de488911f4bb5985886f209fee801.pdf |
Conference
Conference | 40th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | MERGA 40 |
Country/Territory | Australia |
City | Melbourne |
Period | 2/07/17 → 6/07/17 |
Internet address |