Overlooked and undervalued: The neglected role of fauna and a global bias in ecological restoration assessments

Sophie L. Cross, Sean Tomlinson, Michael D. Craig, Kingsley W. Dixon, Philip W. Bateman

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Globally increasing rates of mine site discontinuations are resulting in the need for immediate implementation of effective conservation and management strategies. Surveying vegetation structure is a common method of assessing restoration success; however, responses of fauna to mine site restoration remain largely overlooked and understudied despite their importance within ecosystems as ecological engineers, pollinators, and restoration facilitators. Here we review the current state of the use of fauna in assessments of mine site restoration success globally, and address biases or shortcomings that indicate the assessment approach may undershoot closure and restoration success. We identified just 101 peer-reviewed publications or book chapters over a 49-year period that assess responses of fauna to mine site restoration globally. Most studies originate in Australia, with an emphasis on just one company. Assessments favour general species diversity and richness, with a particular focus on invertebrate responses to mine site restoration. Noteworthy issues included biases towards origin of study, study type, and target taxa. Further searches of the grey literature relating to fauna monitoring in mine site restoration, which was far more difficult to access, yielded six monitoring/guidance documents, three conference proceedings, two book chapters without empirical data, and a bulletin. As with peer-reviewed publications, grey literature focussed on invertebrate responses to restoration, or mentioned fauna only at the most basic level. We emphasise the need for global re-evaluation of regulatory standards to address these major limitations in assessing the capacity of the mining industry to comprehensively and representatively restore faunal communities after mining.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPacific Conservation Biology
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 25 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

fauna
invertebrate
restoration
conference proceeding
vegetation structure
monitoring
pollinator
mining industry
surveying
species diversity
species richness
ecosystem

Cite this

@article{253068f15c2b4688918cf904596758d2,
title = "Overlooked and undervalued: The neglected role of fauna and a global bias in ecological restoration assessments",
abstract = "Globally increasing rates of mine site discontinuations are resulting in the need for immediate implementation of effective conservation and management strategies. Surveying vegetation structure is a common method of assessing restoration success; however, responses of fauna to mine site restoration remain largely overlooked and understudied despite their importance within ecosystems as ecological engineers, pollinators, and restoration facilitators. Here we review the current state of the use of fauna in assessments of mine site restoration success globally, and address biases or shortcomings that indicate the assessment approach may undershoot closure and restoration success. We identified just 101 peer-reviewed publications or book chapters over a 49-year period that assess responses of fauna to mine site restoration globally. Most studies originate in Australia, with an emphasis on just one company. Assessments favour general species diversity and richness, with a particular focus on invertebrate responses to mine site restoration. Noteworthy issues included biases towards origin of study, study type, and target taxa. Further searches of the grey literature relating to fauna monitoring in mine site restoration, which was far more difficult to access, yielded six monitoring/guidance documents, three conference proceedings, two book chapters without empirical data, and a bulletin. As with peer-reviewed publications, grey literature focussed on invertebrate responses to restoration, or mentioned fauna only at the most basic level. We emphasise the need for global re-evaluation of regulatory standards to address these major limitations in assessing the capacity of the mining industry to comprehensively and representatively restore faunal communities after mining.",
keywords = "mine, rehabilitation",
author = "Cross, {Sophie L.} and Sean Tomlinson and Craig, {Michael D.} and Dixon, {Kingsley W.} and Bateman, {Philip W.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1071/PC18079",
language = "English",
journal = "Pacific Conservation Biology",
issn = "1038-2097",
publisher = "Surrey Beatty and Sons Pty Ltd",

}

Overlooked and undervalued : The neglected role of fauna and a global bias in ecological restoration assessments. / Cross, Sophie L.; Tomlinson, Sean; Craig, Michael D.; Dixon, Kingsley W.; Bateman, Philip W.

In: Pacific Conservation Biology, 25.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Overlooked and undervalued

T2 - The neglected role of fauna and a global bias in ecological restoration assessments

AU - Cross, Sophie L.

AU - Tomlinson, Sean

AU - Craig, Michael D.

AU - Dixon, Kingsley W.

AU - Bateman, Philip W.

PY - 2019/1/25

Y1 - 2019/1/25

N2 - Globally increasing rates of mine site discontinuations are resulting in the need for immediate implementation of effective conservation and management strategies. Surveying vegetation structure is a common method of assessing restoration success; however, responses of fauna to mine site restoration remain largely overlooked and understudied despite their importance within ecosystems as ecological engineers, pollinators, and restoration facilitators. Here we review the current state of the use of fauna in assessments of mine site restoration success globally, and address biases or shortcomings that indicate the assessment approach may undershoot closure and restoration success. We identified just 101 peer-reviewed publications or book chapters over a 49-year period that assess responses of fauna to mine site restoration globally. Most studies originate in Australia, with an emphasis on just one company. Assessments favour general species diversity and richness, with a particular focus on invertebrate responses to mine site restoration. Noteworthy issues included biases towards origin of study, study type, and target taxa. Further searches of the grey literature relating to fauna monitoring in mine site restoration, which was far more difficult to access, yielded six monitoring/guidance documents, three conference proceedings, two book chapters without empirical data, and a bulletin. As with peer-reviewed publications, grey literature focussed on invertebrate responses to restoration, or mentioned fauna only at the most basic level. We emphasise the need for global re-evaluation of regulatory standards to address these major limitations in assessing the capacity of the mining industry to comprehensively and representatively restore faunal communities after mining.

AB - Globally increasing rates of mine site discontinuations are resulting in the need for immediate implementation of effective conservation and management strategies. Surveying vegetation structure is a common method of assessing restoration success; however, responses of fauna to mine site restoration remain largely overlooked and understudied despite their importance within ecosystems as ecological engineers, pollinators, and restoration facilitators. Here we review the current state of the use of fauna in assessments of mine site restoration success globally, and address biases or shortcomings that indicate the assessment approach may undershoot closure and restoration success. We identified just 101 peer-reviewed publications or book chapters over a 49-year period that assess responses of fauna to mine site restoration globally. Most studies originate in Australia, with an emphasis on just one company. Assessments favour general species diversity and richness, with a particular focus on invertebrate responses to mine site restoration. Noteworthy issues included biases towards origin of study, study type, and target taxa. Further searches of the grey literature relating to fauna monitoring in mine site restoration, which was far more difficult to access, yielded six monitoring/guidance documents, three conference proceedings, two book chapters without empirical data, and a bulletin. As with peer-reviewed publications, grey literature focussed on invertebrate responses to restoration, or mentioned fauna only at the most basic level. We emphasise the need for global re-evaluation of regulatory standards to address these major limitations in assessing the capacity of the mining industry to comprehensively and representatively restore faunal communities after mining.

KW - mine

KW - rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066119777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1071/PC18079

DO - 10.1071/PC18079

M3 - Review article

JO - Pacific Conservation Biology

JF - Pacific Conservation Biology

SN - 1038-2097

ER -