Open or Bordered? Singapore, Industrialisation and Malaysian Workers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article offers a new approach to the study of Singapore history through an interrogation of the city-state’s borderedness and openness to Malaysian workers during the 1970s and 1980s. This was the period in which the foundations of modern Singapore were laid, as the state opened its borders to meet the demand for labour in the industrialisation program. Yet, this open-border policy was overlaid by a state system of work permits, levies and penalties designed to control migrant labour. The policy turned contradictory over time, attempting to reduce Singapore’s reliance on foreign workers while in practice increasing their numbers. Despite its best efforts, the state was never totally successful in policing the border as workers and employers found ways to circumvent the controls. Regardless, state efforts to adjust border, labour and immigration policies to meet the immediate and imagined contingencies of its modernisation agenda were extensive and relentless. This suggests that we need to consider in more nuanced ways recent notions of borders as zones of transgressiveness that are free from state controls. In the city-state of Singapore during the 1970s and 1980s, the border was a complex zone of both control and transgression.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)206-223
Number of pages18
JournalAsian Studies Review
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

industrialization
Singapore
worker
work permit
labor
labor policy
foreign worker
government supervision
immigration policy
contingency
modernization
penalty
employer
migrant
Industrialization
Workers
demand
history
City-state
1970s

Cite this

@article{333b9eb8494b4c13b79d59cd083b5be9,
title = "Open or Bordered? Singapore, Industrialisation and Malaysian Workers",
abstract = "This article offers a new approach to the study of Singapore history through an interrogation of the city-state’s borderedness and openness to Malaysian workers during the 1970s and 1980s. This was the period in which the foundations of modern Singapore were laid, as the state opened its borders to meet the demand for labour in the industrialisation program. Yet, this open-border policy was overlaid by a state system of work permits, levies and penalties designed to control migrant labour. The policy turned contradictory over time, attempting to reduce Singapore’s reliance on foreign workers while in practice increasing their numbers. Despite its best efforts, the state was never totally successful in policing the border as workers and employers found ways to circumvent the controls. Regardless, state efforts to adjust border, labour and immigration policies to meet the immediate and imagined contingencies of its modernisation agenda were extensive and relentless. This suggests that we need to consider in more nuanced ways recent notions of borders as zones of transgressiveness that are free from state controls. In the city-state of Singapore during the 1970s and 1980s, the border was a complex zone of both control and transgression.",
keywords = "Borders, industrialisation, migration, state controls, work permits",
author = "Stephen Dobbs and Loh, {Kah Seng}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/10357823.2019.1590312",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "206--223",
journal = "Asian Studies Review",
issn = "1035-7823",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

Open or Bordered? Singapore, Industrialisation and Malaysian Workers. / Dobbs, Stephen; Loh, Kah Seng.

In: Asian Studies Review, Vol. 43, No. 2, 03.04.2019, p. 206-223.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Open or Bordered? Singapore, Industrialisation and Malaysian Workers

AU - Dobbs, Stephen

AU - Loh, Kah Seng

PY - 2019/4/3

Y1 - 2019/4/3

N2 - This article offers a new approach to the study of Singapore history through an interrogation of the city-state’s borderedness and openness to Malaysian workers during the 1970s and 1980s. This was the period in which the foundations of modern Singapore were laid, as the state opened its borders to meet the demand for labour in the industrialisation program. Yet, this open-border policy was overlaid by a state system of work permits, levies and penalties designed to control migrant labour. The policy turned contradictory over time, attempting to reduce Singapore’s reliance on foreign workers while in practice increasing their numbers. Despite its best efforts, the state was never totally successful in policing the border as workers and employers found ways to circumvent the controls. Regardless, state efforts to adjust border, labour and immigration policies to meet the immediate and imagined contingencies of its modernisation agenda were extensive and relentless. This suggests that we need to consider in more nuanced ways recent notions of borders as zones of transgressiveness that are free from state controls. In the city-state of Singapore during the 1970s and 1980s, the border was a complex zone of both control and transgression.

AB - This article offers a new approach to the study of Singapore history through an interrogation of the city-state’s borderedness and openness to Malaysian workers during the 1970s and 1980s. This was the period in which the foundations of modern Singapore were laid, as the state opened its borders to meet the demand for labour in the industrialisation program. Yet, this open-border policy was overlaid by a state system of work permits, levies and penalties designed to control migrant labour. The policy turned contradictory over time, attempting to reduce Singapore’s reliance on foreign workers while in practice increasing their numbers. Despite its best efforts, the state was never totally successful in policing the border as workers and employers found ways to circumvent the controls. Regardless, state efforts to adjust border, labour and immigration policies to meet the immediate and imagined contingencies of its modernisation agenda were extensive and relentless. This suggests that we need to consider in more nuanced ways recent notions of borders as zones of transgressiveness that are free from state controls. In the city-state of Singapore during the 1970s and 1980s, the border was a complex zone of both control and transgression.

KW - Borders

KW - industrialisation

KW - migration

KW - state controls

KW - work permits

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064729303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10357823.2019.1590312

DO - 10.1080/10357823.2019.1590312

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 206

EP - 223

JO - Asian Studies Review

JF - Asian Studies Review

SN - 1035-7823

IS - 2

ER -