Online advertising by three commercial breast imaging services: Message takeout and effectiveness

R. Johnson, G. Jalleh, I.S. Pratt, R.J. Donovan, C. Lin, Christobel Saunders, T.J. Slevin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Mammography is widely acknowledged to be the most cost-effective technique for population screening for breast cancer. Recently in Australia, imaging modalities other than mammography, including thermography, electrical impedance, and computerised breast imaging, have been increasingly promoted as alternative methods of breast cancer screening. This study assessed the impact of three commercial breast imaging companies' promotional material upon consumers' beliefs about the effectiveness of the companies' technology in detecting breast cancer, and consumers' intentions to seek more information or consider having their breasts imaged by these modalities. Results showed 90% of respondents agreed that the companies' promotional material promoted the message that the advertised breast imaging method was effective in detecting breast cancer, and 80% agreed that the material promoted the message that the imaging method was equally or more effective than a mammogram. These findings have implications for women's preference for and uptake of alternative breast imaging services over mammography. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)780-786
    JournalBREAST
    Volume22
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

      Fingerprint

    Cite this

    Johnson, R., Jalleh, G., Pratt, I. S., Donovan, R. J., Lin, C., Saunders, C., & Slevin, T. J. (2013). Online advertising by three commercial breast imaging services: Message takeout and effectiveness. BREAST, 22(5), 780-786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2013.01.013