Objective monitoring of nociception: a review of current commercial solutions

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nociception, in contrast to pain, is not a subjective feeling, but the physiological encoding and processing of nociceptive stimuli. However, monitoring nociception remains a challenge in attempts to lower the incidence of acute postoperative pain and the move towards a more automated approach to analgesia and anaesthesia. To date, several commercialised devices promise a more accurate reflection of nociception than the traditionally used vital signs, blood pressure and heart rate. This narrative review presents an overview of existing technologies and commercially available devices, and offers a perspective for future research. Although firm conclusions about individual methods may be premature, none currently appears to offer a sufficiently broad applicability. Furthermore, there is currently no firm evidence for any clinically relevant influence of such devices on patient outcome. However, the available monitors have significantly aided the understanding of underlying mechanisms and identification of potential pitfalls.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 30 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Nociception
Equipment and Supplies
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Vital Signs
Acute Pain
Postoperative Pain
Emotions
Heart Rate
Blood Pressure
Technology
Pain
Incidence

Cite this

@article{fff23bc7a3144f8fabe0fa1ab6d81ad9,
title = "Objective monitoring of nociception: a review of current commercial solutions",
abstract = "Nociception, in contrast to pain, is not a subjective feeling, but the physiological encoding and processing of nociceptive stimuli. However, monitoring nociception remains a challenge in attempts to lower the incidence of acute postoperative pain and the move towards a more automated approach to analgesia and anaesthesia. To date, several commercialised devices promise a more accurate reflection of nociception than the traditionally used vital signs, blood pressure and heart rate. This narrative review presents an overview of existing technologies and commercially available devices, and offers a perspective for future research. Although firm conclusions about individual methods may be premature, none currently appears to offer a sufficiently broad applicability. Furthermore, there is currently no firm evidence for any clinically relevant influence of such devices on patient outcome. However, the available monitors have significantly aided the understanding of underlying mechanisms and identification of potential pitfalls.",
keywords = "analgesia, nociception, nociception index, nociceptive flexion reflex, pupillometry, skin conductance, surgical pleth index",
author = "Thomas Ledowski",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.024",
language = "English",
journal = "British Journal of Anaesthesia",
issn = "0007-0912",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Objective monitoring of nociception

T2 - a review of current commercial solutions

AU - Ledowski, Thomas

PY - 2019/4/30

Y1 - 2019/4/30

N2 - Nociception, in contrast to pain, is not a subjective feeling, but the physiological encoding and processing of nociceptive stimuli. However, monitoring nociception remains a challenge in attempts to lower the incidence of acute postoperative pain and the move towards a more automated approach to analgesia and anaesthesia. To date, several commercialised devices promise a more accurate reflection of nociception than the traditionally used vital signs, blood pressure and heart rate. This narrative review presents an overview of existing technologies and commercially available devices, and offers a perspective for future research. Although firm conclusions about individual methods may be premature, none currently appears to offer a sufficiently broad applicability. Furthermore, there is currently no firm evidence for any clinically relevant influence of such devices on patient outcome. However, the available monitors have significantly aided the understanding of underlying mechanisms and identification of potential pitfalls.

AB - Nociception, in contrast to pain, is not a subjective feeling, but the physiological encoding and processing of nociceptive stimuli. However, monitoring nociception remains a challenge in attempts to lower the incidence of acute postoperative pain and the move towards a more automated approach to analgesia and anaesthesia. To date, several commercialised devices promise a more accurate reflection of nociception than the traditionally used vital signs, blood pressure and heart rate. This narrative review presents an overview of existing technologies and commercially available devices, and offers a perspective for future research. Although firm conclusions about individual methods may be premature, none currently appears to offer a sufficiently broad applicability. Furthermore, there is currently no firm evidence for any clinically relevant influence of such devices on patient outcome. However, the available monitors have significantly aided the understanding of underlying mechanisms and identification of potential pitfalls.

KW - analgesia

KW - nociception

KW - nociception index

KW - nociceptive flexion reflex

KW - pupillometry

KW - skin conductance

KW - surgical pleth index

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064809539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.024

DO - 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.024

M3 - Review article

JO - British Journal of Anaesthesia

JF - British Journal of Anaesthesia

SN - 0007-0912

ER -