Objective analysis of cancer stem cell marker expression using immunohistochemistry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Analysis of immunohistochemical expression is often a subjective and semiquantitative process that can lead to the inconsistent reporting of results. To assess the effect that region selection and quantification method have on results, five different cancer stem cell markers were used in this study to compare tissue scoring with digital analysis methods that used three different tissue annotation methods. Samples of tumour and normal mucosa were used from 10 consecutive stage II colon cancer patients and stained for the putative cancer stem cell markers ALDH1, CD44v6, CD133, Lgr5 and SOX2. Tissue scoring was found to have considerably different results to digital analysis with the three different digital methods harbouring concordant results overall. However, SOX2 on normal tissue and CD133 on tumour and normal tissue produced discordant results which could be attributed to the different regions of tissue that were analysed. It is important that quantification method and selection of analysis areas are considered as part of study design to ensure that reproducible and consistent results are reported in the literature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)24-29
Number of pages6
JournalPathology
Volume49
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

Neoplastic Stem Cells
Immunohistochemistry
Colonic Neoplasms
Neoplasms
Mucous Membrane

Cite this

@article{9f5876f03ba94137985d7765455e572b,
title = "Objective analysis of cancer stem cell marker expression using immunohistochemistry",
abstract = "Analysis of immunohistochemical expression is often a subjective and semiquantitative process that can lead to the inconsistent reporting of results. To assess the effect that region selection and quantification method have on results, five different cancer stem cell markers were used in this study to compare tissue scoring with digital analysis methods that used three different tissue annotation methods. Samples of tumour and normal mucosa were used from 10 consecutive stage II colon cancer patients and stained for the putative cancer stem cell markers ALDH1, CD44v6, CD133, Lgr5 and SOX2. Tissue scoring was found to have considerably different results to digital analysis with the three different digital methods harbouring concordant results overall. However, SOX2 on normal tissue and CD133 on tumour and normal tissue produced discordant results which could be attributed to the different regions of tissue that were analysed. It is important that quantification method and selection of analysis areas are considered as part of study design to ensure that reproducible and consistent results are reported in the literature.",
keywords = "ALDH1, cancer stem cell, CD133, CD44v6, Colorectal cancer, immunohistochemistry, Lgr5, SOX2",
author = "Miller, {T. J.} and McCoy, {M. J.} and C. Hemmings and Bulsara, {M. K.} and B. Iacopetta and Platell, {C. F.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pathol.2016.09.063",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "24--29",
journal = "Pathology",
issn = "0031-3025",
publisher = "Pergamon",
number = "1",

}

Objective analysis of cancer stem cell marker expression using immunohistochemistry. / Miller, T. J.; McCoy, M. J.; Hemmings, C.; Bulsara, M. K.; Iacopetta, B.; Platell, C. F.

In: Pathology, Vol. 49, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 24-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Objective analysis of cancer stem cell marker expression using immunohistochemistry

AU - Miller, T. J.

AU - McCoy, M. J.

AU - Hemmings, C.

AU - Bulsara, M. K.

AU - Iacopetta, B.

AU - Platell, C. F.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Analysis of immunohistochemical expression is often a subjective and semiquantitative process that can lead to the inconsistent reporting of results. To assess the effect that region selection and quantification method have on results, five different cancer stem cell markers were used in this study to compare tissue scoring with digital analysis methods that used three different tissue annotation methods. Samples of tumour and normal mucosa were used from 10 consecutive stage II colon cancer patients and stained for the putative cancer stem cell markers ALDH1, CD44v6, CD133, Lgr5 and SOX2. Tissue scoring was found to have considerably different results to digital analysis with the three different digital methods harbouring concordant results overall. However, SOX2 on normal tissue and CD133 on tumour and normal tissue produced discordant results which could be attributed to the different regions of tissue that were analysed. It is important that quantification method and selection of analysis areas are considered as part of study design to ensure that reproducible and consistent results are reported in the literature.

AB - Analysis of immunohistochemical expression is often a subjective and semiquantitative process that can lead to the inconsistent reporting of results. To assess the effect that region selection and quantification method have on results, five different cancer stem cell markers were used in this study to compare tissue scoring with digital analysis methods that used three different tissue annotation methods. Samples of tumour and normal mucosa were used from 10 consecutive stage II colon cancer patients and stained for the putative cancer stem cell markers ALDH1, CD44v6, CD133, Lgr5 and SOX2. Tissue scoring was found to have considerably different results to digital analysis with the three different digital methods harbouring concordant results overall. However, SOX2 on normal tissue and CD133 on tumour and normal tissue produced discordant results which could be attributed to the different regions of tissue that were analysed. It is important that quantification method and selection of analysis areas are considered as part of study design to ensure that reproducible and consistent results are reported in the literature.

KW - ALDH1

KW - cancer stem cell

KW - CD133

KW - CD44v6

KW - Colorectal cancer

KW - immunohistochemistry

KW - Lgr5

KW - SOX2

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006483474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pathol.2016.09.063

DO - 10.1016/j.pathol.2016.09.063

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 24

EP - 29

JO - Pathology

JF - Pathology

SN - 0031-3025

IS - 1

ER -