Nuclear DNA content of human breast carcinoma: a comparison of results obtained by microspectrophotometry and flow cytometry of paraffin embedded tissue

This study compares 2 techniques for estimating the nuclear DNA content of tumor cell lines: (i) static cytometry of smears taken from fresh tissue and (ii) flow cytometry of cells extracted from paraffin embedded tissue. Parallel determinations of DNA content, using both techniques, were made on samples of tissue taken from 130 female patients with breast carcinoma. Using a simple classification into diploid and non-diploid groups, the 2 techniques yielded discrepant results in 11% of cases. The most frequent causes of disagreement were (a) the inability of static cytometry to distinguish between a diploid and a near-diploid peak and (b) for flow cytometry, the difficulty of determining whether a minor peak in the tetraploid region represented the G2 peak of a diploid cell line or the G0/G1 peak of a tetraploid cell line.If it is deemed necessary to accurately assess ploidy status, flow cytometry on paraffin embedded tissue, using modern statistical programmes, would seem to be most practical for routine use, but some neoplasms, particularly those with an equivocal ploidy peak in the tetraploid range by this method, will require static cytometry to accurately assess nuclear DNA content. Using this approach, it appears that the disagreement between the 2 techniques would be less than 5%.