Now you see, now you don’t … the influence of visual occlusion on racket and ball kinematics in the tennis serve

Georgia Giblin, David Whiteside, Machar Reid

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The serve is considered amongst the most important strokes in tennis. Not surprisingly, the development of a mechanically consistent and proficient serve is paramount. Correspondingly, drills that involve players serving with their eyes closed are thought to promote mechanical consistency. The purpose of this study was therefore to contrast the effect of the removal of visual feedback on ball and racket kinematics in the serve. A 10-camera 500-Hz VICON MX motion analysis system recorded the service actions of eight elite young players as they performed three serves with eyes open and three serves with eyes closed. Removal of vision resulted in considerable differences in both racket and ball kinematics, with players failing to make contact on 16 of 24 serves. Temporally, the preparation phase was significantly shorter with eyes closed. Spatially, the ball was located 6.5 cm further to the right at zenith, and 13 cm higher at impact with eyes closed. These results highlight that the serve is not entirely pre-programmable, and that visual feedback is critical to the spatiotemporal regulation of the serve. In turn, coaches need to be aware of the implications of modifying visual feedback in serve, and ensure that the consequence is congruent with their intent.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)23-33
    Number of pages11
    JournalSports Biomechanics
    Volume16
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2017

    Fingerprint

    Racquet Sports
    Tennis
    Biomechanical Phenomena
    Sensory Feedback
    Mandrillus
    Stroke

    Cite this

    @article{82c13b06cec6479ab169dc1726d00db4,
    title = "Now you see, now you don’t … the influence of visual occlusion on racket and ball kinematics in the tennis serve",
    abstract = "The serve is considered amongst the most important strokes in tennis. Not surprisingly, the development of a mechanically consistent and proficient serve is paramount. Correspondingly, drills that involve players serving with their eyes closed are thought to promote mechanical consistency. The purpose of this study was therefore to contrast the effect of the removal of visual feedback on ball and racket kinematics in the serve. A 10-camera 500-Hz VICON MX motion analysis system recorded the service actions of eight elite young players as they performed three serves with eyes open and three serves with eyes closed. Removal of vision resulted in considerable differences in both racket and ball kinematics, with players failing to make contact on 16 of 24 serves. Temporally, the preparation phase was significantly shorter with eyes closed. Spatially, the ball was located 6.5 cm further to the right at zenith, and 13 cm higher at impact with eyes closed. These results highlight that the serve is not entirely pre-programmable, and that visual feedback is critical to the spatiotemporal regulation of the serve. In turn, coaches need to be aware of the implications of modifying visual feedback in serve, and ensure that the consequence is congruent with their intent.",
    keywords = "constraints, Variability, vision",
    author = "Georgia Giblin and David Whiteside and Machar Reid",
    year = "2017",
    month = "1",
    day = "2",
    doi = "10.1080/14763141.2016.1179337",
    language = "English",
    volume = "16",
    pages = "23--33",
    journal = "Sports Biomechanics",
    issn = "1476-3141",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "1",

    }

    Now you see, now you don’t … the influence of visual occlusion on racket and ball kinematics in the tennis serve. / Giblin, Georgia; Whiteside, David; Reid, Machar.

    In: Sports Biomechanics, Vol. 16, No. 1, 02.01.2017, p. 23-33.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Now you see, now you don’t … the influence of visual occlusion on racket and ball kinematics in the tennis serve

    AU - Giblin, Georgia

    AU - Whiteside, David

    AU - Reid, Machar

    PY - 2017/1/2

    Y1 - 2017/1/2

    N2 - The serve is considered amongst the most important strokes in tennis. Not surprisingly, the development of a mechanically consistent and proficient serve is paramount. Correspondingly, drills that involve players serving with their eyes closed are thought to promote mechanical consistency. The purpose of this study was therefore to contrast the effect of the removal of visual feedback on ball and racket kinematics in the serve. A 10-camera 500-Hz VICON MX motion analysis system recorded the service actions of eight elite young players as they performed three serves with eyes open and three serves with eyes closed. Removal of vision resulted in considerable differences in both racket and ball kinematics, with players failing to make contact on 16 of 24 serves. Temporally, the preparation phase was significantly shorter with eyes closed. Spatially, the ball was located 6.5 cm further to the right at zenith, and 13 cm higher at impact with eyes closed. These results highlight that the serve is not entirely pre-programmable, and that visual feedback is critical to the spatiotemporal regulation of the serve. In turn, coaches need to be aware of the implications of modifying visual feedback in serve, and ensure that the consequence is congruent with their intent.

    AB - The serve is considered amongst the most important strokes in tennis. Not surprisingly, the development of a mechanically consistent and proficient serve is paramount. Correspondingly, drills that involve players serving with their eyes closed are thought to promote mechanical consistency. The purpose of this study was therefore to contrast the effect of the removal of visual feedback on ball and racket kinematics in the serve. A 10-camera 500-Hz VICON MX motion analysis system recorded the service actions of eight elite young players as they performed three serves with eyes open and three serves with eyes closed. Removal of vision resulted in considerable differences in both racket and ball kinematics, with players failing to make contact on 16 of 24 serves. Temporally, the preparation phase was significantly shorter with eyes closed. Spatially, the ball was located 6.5 cm further to the right at zenith, and 13 cm higher at impact with eyes closed. These results highlight that the serve is not entirely pre-programmable, and that visual feedback is critical to the spatiotemporal regulation of the serve. In turn, coaches need to be aware of the implications of modifying visual feedback in serve, and ensure that the consequence is congruent with their intent.

    KW - constraints

    KW - Variability

    KW - vision

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971455364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/14763141.2016.1179337

    DO - 10.1080/14763141.2016.1179337

    M3 - Article

    VL - 16

    SP - 23

    EP - 33

    JO - Sports Biomechanics

    JF - Sports Biomechanics

    SN - 1476-3141

    IS - 1

    ER -