Nominal subclasses in Dalabon (South Western Arnhem Land)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Australian Journal of Linguistics, 2015 Vol. 35, No. 1, 1–52, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2015.976900 Nominal Subclasses in Dalabon (South-western Arnhem Land)* MAÏA PONSONNET Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage—CNRS, Université Lyon 2 and Australian National University (Accepted 28 March 2014) This paper describes a distinctive system of nominal subclasses observed in Dalabon, a non-Pama-Nyungan, Gunwinyguan language of south-western Arnhem Land, Austra- lia. These subclasses differ from what is usually called ‘noun classes’ in Australian languages, and no such system has been described for an Australian language so far. While most Gunwinyguan languages use noun class prefixes offering an overt categorization of noun classes, Dalabon has no such prefixes. On the other hand, six semantically coherent nominal subclasses can be delineated based on four inter-related criteria—noun incorporation, boundness, obligatory possession and possessor raising. These subclasses are animate-part nouns (incorporable, strictly bound, obligatorily possessed, raising their possessors freely), kin-terms (incorporable, strictly bound, obligatorily possessed, raising their possessor when incorporated), inanimate-part nouns (incorporable, strictly bound, not obligatorily possessed), features of the landscape (incorporable, semi-bound, not obligatorily possessed), natural-kind nouns (non- incorporable) and generic nouns (incorporable free nouns). Some of the subclasses qualify as more or less inalienable. Along the way, the article discusses various aspects of Dalabon grammar such as word classes, noun incorporation and possessive construc- tions. The nominal subclass divisions also shed light upon some the distribution and semantics of the ubiquitous -no suffix, which remained obscure hitherto.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-52
Number of pages52
JournalAustralian Journal of Linguistics
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

language
possession
grammar
semantics
linguistics
Arnhem Land
Nouns
Noun Class
Possessor
Australian Languages
Prefix
Natural Kinds
Grammar
Lyon
Kin Terms
Noun Incorporation
Possessive Constructions
Possession
Animate
Word Class

Cite this

@article{e6829cfb6b4142a4aa950a4463ac7674,
title = "Nominal subclasses in Dalabon (South Western Arnhem Land)",
abstract = "Australian Journal of Linguistics, 2015 Vol. 35, No. 1, 1–52, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2015.976900 Nominal Subclasses in Dalabon (South-western Arnhem Land)* MA{\"I}A PONSONNET Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage—CNRS, Universit{\'e} Lyon 2 and Australian National University (Accepted 28 March 2014) This paper describes a distinctive system of nominal subclasses observed in Dalabon, a non-Pama-Nyungan, Gunwinyguan language of south-western Arnhem Land, Austra- lia. These subclasses differ from what is usually called ‘noun classes’ in Australian languages, and no such system has been described for an Australian language so far. While most Gunwinyguan languages use noun class prefixes offering an overt categorization of noun classes, Dalabon has no such prefixes. On the other hand, six semantically coherent nominal subclasses can be delineated based on four inter-related criteria—noun incorporation, boundness, obligatory possession and possessor raising. These subclasses are animate-part nouns (incorporable, strictly bound, obligatorily possessed, raising their possessors freely), kin-terms (incorporable, strictly bound, obligatorily possessed, raising their possessor when incorporated), inanimate-part nouns (incorporable, strictly bound, not obligatorily possessed), features of the landscape (incorporable, semi-bound, not obligatorily possessed), natural-kind nouns (non- incorporable) and generic nouns (incorporable free nouns). Some of the subclasses qualify as more or less inalienable. Along the way, the article discusses various aspects of Dalabon grammar such as word classes, noun incorporation and possessive construc- tions. The nominal subclass divisions also shed light upon some the distribution and semantics of the ubiquitous -no suffix, which remained obscure hitherto.",
keywords = "Boundness, Gunwinyguan, Inalienability, Noun Classes, Noun Incorporation, Possessor Raising",
author = "Ma{\"i}a Ponsonnet",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/07268602.2015.976900",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "1--52",
journal = "Australian Journal of Linguistics",
issn = "0726-8602",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Nominal subclasses in Dalabon (South Western Arnhem Land). / Ponsonnet, Maïa.

In: Australian Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2015, p. 1-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nominal subclasses in Dalabon (South Western Arnhem Land)

AU - Ponsonnet, Maïa

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Australian Journal of Linguistics, 2015 Vol. 35, No. 1, 1–52, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2015.976900 Nominal Subclasses in Dalabon (South-western Arnhem Land)* MAÏA PONSONNET Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage—CNRS, Université Lyon 2 and Australian National University (Accepted 28 March 2014) This paper describes a distinctive system of nominal subclasses observed in Dalabon, a non-Pama-Nyungan, Gunwinyguan language of south-western Arnhem Land, Austra- lia. These subclasses differ from what is usually called ‘noun classes’ in Australian languages, and no such system has been described for an Australian language so far. While most Gunwinyguan languages use noun class prefixes offering an overt categorization of noun classes, Dalabon has no such prefixes. On the other hand, six semantically coherent nominal subclasses can be delineated based on four inter-related criteria—noun incorporation, boundness, obligatory possession and possessor raising. These subclasses are animate-part nouns (incorporable, strictly bound, obligatorily possessed, raising their possessors freely), kin-terms (incorporable, strictly bound, obligatorily possessed, raising their possessor when incorporated), inanimate-part nouns (incorporable, strictly bound, not obligatorily possessed), features of the landscape (incorporable, semi-bound, not obligatorily possessed), natural-kind nouns (non- incorporable) and generic nouns (incorporable free nouns). Some of the subclasses qualify as more or less inalienable. Along the way, the article discusses various aspects of Dalabon grammar such as word classes, noun incorporation and possessive construc- tions. The nominal subclass divisions also shed light upon some the distribution and semantics of the ubiquitous -no suffix, which remained obscure hitherto.

AB - Australian Journal of Linguistics, 2015 Vol. 35, No. 1, 1–52, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2015.976900 Nominal Subclasses in Dalabon (South-western Arnhem Land)* MAÏA PONSONNET Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage—CNRS, Université Lyon 2 and Australian National University (Accepted 28 March 2014) This paper describes a distinctive system of nominal subclasses observed in Dalabon, a non-Pama-Nyungan, Gunwinyguan language of south-western Arnhem Land, Austra- lia. These subclasses differ from what is usually called ‘noun classes’ in Australian languages, and no such system has been described for an Australian language so far. While most Gunwinyguan languages use noun class prefixes offering an overt categorization of noun classes, Dalabon has no such prefixes. On the other hand, six semantically coherent nominal subclasses can be delineated based on four inter-related criteria—noun incorporation, boundness, obligatory possession and possessor raising. These subclasses are animate-part nouns (incorporable, strictly bound, obligatorily possessed, raising their possessors freely), kin-terms (incorporable, strictly bound, obligatorily possessed, raising their possessor when incorporated), inanimate-part nouns (incorporable, strictly bound, not obligatorily possessed), features of the landscape (incorporable, semi-bound, not obligatorily possessed), natural-kind nouns (non- incorporable) and generic nouns (incorporable free nouns). Some of the subclasses qualify as more or less inalienable. Along the way, the article discusses various aspects of Dalabon grammar such as word classes, noun incorporation and possessive construc- tions. The nominal subclass divisions also shed light upon some the distribution and semantics of the ubiquitous -no suffix, which remained obscure hitherto.

KW - Boundness

KW - Gunwinyguan

KW - Inalienability

KW - Noun Classes

KW - Noun Incorporation

KW - Possessor Raising

U2 - 10.1080/07268602.2015.976900

DO - 10.1080/07268602.2015.976900

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 1

EP - 52

JO - Australian Journal of Linguistics

JF - Australian Journal of Linguistics

SN - 0726-8602

IS - 1

ER -