No Evidence for Temporal Decay in Working Memory

Stephan Lewandowsky, K. Oberauer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

What drives forgetting in working memory? Recent evidence suggests that in a complex-span task in which an irrelevant processing task alternates with presentation of the memoranda, recall declines when the time taken to complete the processing task is extended while holding the time for rehearsal in between processing steps constant (Portrat, Barrouillet, & Camos, 2008). This time-based forgetting was interpreted in support for the role of time-based decay in working memory. In this article, we argue the contrary position by (a) showing in an experiment that the processing task in Portrat et al.’s (2008) study gave rise to uncontrolled post-error processes that occupied the attentional bottleneck, thus preventing restorative rehearsal, and (b) showing that when those post-error processes are statistically controlled, there is no evidence for temporal decay in Portrat et al.’s study. We conclude that currently there exists no direct evidence for temporal decay in the complex-span paradigm. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1545-1551
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'No Evidence for Temporal Decay in Working Memory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this