Abstract
Recently, red blood cell transfusions have been advocated for patients with acute myocardial infarction when hemoglobin falls below 10 g/dL, based on the Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion (MINT) trial, which showed a trend to benefit, compared to deferring transfusion until hemoglobin was below 7-8 g/dL. However, the trial failed to reach its primary endpoint. A meta-analysis including the totality of published relevant evidence does not support the superiority of one blood transfusion strategy over another. Advocating a policy of more liberal transfusion for patients with myocardial infarction and anemia is premature, potentially erroneous, and harmful.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 312-315 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2024 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'No evidence for liberal transfusion in acute myocardial infarction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver