No evidence for a role of reconsolidation in updating of paired associates

Fiona Allanson, Ullrich K.H. Ecker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reconsolidation theory states that memories are labilized through reactivation, making them prone to change, before being re-consolidated. When information in memory requires updating, reconsolidation theory therefore predicts that reminders of previously learned information should facilitate updating of that information and should thus improve memory for the updated information. In two experiments, we tested this prediction by investigating memory for word pairs over a short time-scale. Participants studied word pairs (A–B), some of which were subsequently updated with word pairs that shared the first word (A–C). Half of the A–C pairs received a pre-study reminder of the first word in the pair so as to reactivate and labilize A–B memory. In a recognition memory test targeting the A–C list, reminders by and large had no effect on memory. Results thus failed to support the predictions of reconsolidation theory.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)912-919
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Cognitive Psychology
Volume29
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Associates
Prediction
Reactivation
Experiment
Recognition Memory
State Theory
Time Scales
Recognition (Psychology)

Cite this

@article{ba9674326df748759b0910ba950394d1,
title = "No evidence for a role of reconsolidation in updating of paired associates",
abstract = "Reconsolidation theory states that memories are labilized through reactivation, making them prone to change, before being re-consolidated. When information in memory requires updating, reconsolidation theory therefore predicts that reminders of previously learned information should facilitate updating of that information and should thus improve memory for the updated information. In two experiments, we tested this prediction by investigating memory for word pairs over a short time-scale. Participants studied word pairs (A–B), some of which were subsequently updated with word pairs that shared the first word (A–C). Half of the A–C pairs received a pre-study reminder of the first word in the pair so as to reactivate and labilize A–B memory. In a recognition memory test targeting the A–C list, reminders by and large had no effect on memory. Results thus failed to support the predictions of reconsolidation theory.",
keywords = "interference, Memory updating, paired-associate learning, recognition memory, reconsolidation",
author = "Fiona Allanson and Ecker, {Ullrich K.H.}",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1080/20445911.2017.1360307",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "912--919",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "2044-5911",
publisher = "Psychology Press",
number = "8",

}

No evidence for a role of reconsolidation in updating of paired associates. / Allanson, Fiona; Ecker, Ullrich K.H.

In: Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 29, No. 8, 17.11.2017, p. 912-919.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - No evidence for a role of reconsolidation in updating of paired associates

AU - Allanson, Fiona

AU - Ecker, Ullrich K.H.

PY - 2017/11/17

Y1 - 2017/11/17

N2 - Reconsolidation theory states that memories are labilized through reactivation, making them prone to change, before being re-consolidated. When information in memory requires updating, reconsolidation theory therefore predicts that reminders of previously learned information should facilitate updating of that information and should thus improve memory for the updated information. In two experiments, we tested this prediction by investigating memory for word pairs over a short time-scale. Participants studied word pairs (A–B), some of which were subsequently updated with word pairs that shared the first word (A–C). Half of the A–C pairs received a pre-study reminder of the first word in the pair so as to reactivate and labilize A–B memory. In a recognition memory test targeting the A–C list, reminders by and large had no effect on memory. Results thus failed to support the predictions of reconsolidation theory.

AB - Reconsolidation theory states that memories are labilized through reactivation, making them prone to change, before being re-consolidated. When information in memory requires updating, reconsolidation theory therefore predicts that reminders of previously learned information should facilitate updating of that information and should thus improve memory for the updated information. In two experiments, we tested this prediction by investigating memory for word pairs over a short time-scale. Participants studied word pairs (A–B), some of which were subsequently updated with word pairs that shared the first word (A–C). Half of the A–C pairs received a pre-study reminder of the first word in the pair so as to reactivate and labilize A–B memory. In a recognition memory test targeting the A–C list, reminders by and large had no effect on memory. Results thus failed to support the predictions of reconsolidation theory.

KW - interference

KW - Memory updating

KW - paired-associate learning

KW - recognition memory

KW - reconsolidation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026509809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/20445911.2017.1360307

DO - 10.1080/20445911.2017.1360307

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 912

EP - 919

JO - Journal of Cognitive Psychology

JF - Journal of Cognitive Psychology

SN - 2044-5911

IS - 8

ER -