No borders: Australians talking beyond the nation

Farida Fozdar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)


Academic debate about the anachronism of national borders is extensive. The general population, however, has been less keen to embrace the idea of a 'postnational' world. This paper offers evidence from focus groups with Australians suggesting that in some quarters talking beyond the nation is occurring. However, the ideology of the nation-state remains strong, and such talk is quickly shut down using a particular rhetorical device. This is 'the principle/practical' dichotomy, which insists that dropping national borders is impractical for a range of reasons, despite it perhaps being a valuable idea in principle. The paper explores the ways this occurs, using detailed critical discourse analysis. Practical objections are generally framed in terms of governance rather than cultural issues. However, practical examples of existing 'no borders' situations are used to make the counter-argument that a postnational world is possible.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)367-387
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Language and Politics
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2017


Dive into the research topics of 'No borders: Australians talking beyond the nation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this