No borders: Australians talking beyond the nation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Academic debate about the anachronism of national borders is extensive. The general population, however, has been less keen to embrace the idea of a 'postnational' world. This paper offers evidence from focus groups with Australians suggesting that in some quarters talking beyond the nation is occurring. However, the ideology of the nation-state remains strong, and such talk is quickly shut down using a particular rhetorical device. This is 'the principle/practical' dichotomy, which insists that dropping national borders is impractical for a range of reasons, despite it perhaps being a valuable idea in principle. The paper explores the ways this occurs, using detailed critical discourse analysis. Practical objections are generally framed in terms of governance rather than cultural issues. However, practical examples of existing 'no borders' situations are used to make the counter-argument that a postnational world is possible.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)367-387
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Language and Politics
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

national border
discourse analysis
nation state
ideology
governance
evidence
Group
Postnational

Cite this

@article{b310edc0165a4dc4934d4dcf074bda7d,
title = "No borders: Australians talking beyond the nation",
abstract = "Academic debate about the anachronism of national borders is extensive. The general population, however, has been less keen to embrace the idea of a 'postnational' world. This paper offers evidence from focus groups with Australians suggesting that in some quarters talking beyond the nation is occurring. However, the ideology of the nation-state remains strong, and such talk is quickly shut down using a particular rhetorical device. This is 'the principle/practical' dichotomy, which insists that dropping national borders is impractical for a range of reasons, despite it perhaps being a valuable idea in principle. The paper explores the ways this occurs, using detailed critical discourse analysis. Practical objections are generally framed in terms of governance rather than cultural issues. However, practical examples of existing 'no borders' situations are used to make the counter-argument that a postnational world is possible.",
keywords = "Cosmopolitan, Critical discourse analysis, Nation, Nationalism, No borders, Post-national",
author = "Farida Fozdar",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1075/jlp.15026.foz",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "367--387",
journal = "Journal of Language and Politics",
issn = "1569-2159",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
number = "3",

}

No borders : Australians talking beyond the nation. / Fozdar, Farida.

In: Journal of Language and Politics, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2017, p. 367-387.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - No borders

T2 - Australians talking beyond the nation

AU - Fozdar, Farida

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Academic debate about the anachronism of national borders is extensive. The general population, however, has been less keen to embrace the idea of a 'postnational' world. This paper offers evidence from focus groups with Australians suggesting that in some quarters talking beyond the nation is occurring. However, the ideology of the nation-state remains strong, and such talk is quickly shut down using a particular rhetorical device. This is 'the principle/practical' dichotomy, which insists that dropping national borders is impractical for a range of reasons, despite it perhaps being a valuable idea in principle. The paper explores the ways this occurs, using detailed critical discourse analysis. Practical objections are generally framed in terms of governance rather than cultural issues. However, practical examples of existing 'no borders' situations are used to make the counter-argument that a postnational world is possible.

AB - Academic debate about the anachronism of national borders is extensive. The general population, however, has been less keen to embrace the idea of a 'postnational' world. This paper offers evidence from focus groups with Australians suggesting that in some quarters talking beyond the nation is occurring. However, the ideology of the nation-state remains strong, and such talk is quickly shut down using a particular rhetorical device. This is 'the principle/practical' dichotomy, which insists that dropping national borders is impractical for a range of reasons, despite it perhaps being a valuable idea in principle. The paper explores the ways this occurs, using detailed critical discourse analysis. Practical objections are generally framed in terms of governance rather than cultural issues. However, practical examples of existing 'no borders' situations are used to make the counter-argument that a postnational world is possible.

KW - Cosmopolitan

KW - Critical discourse analysis

KW - Nation

KW - Nationalism

KW - No borders

KW - Post-national

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020966397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1075/jlp.15026.foz

DO - 10.1075/jlp.15026.foz

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 367

EP - 387

JO - Journal of Language and Politics

JF - Journal of Language and Politics

SN - 1569-2159

IS - 3

ER -