TY - JOUR
T1 - New clinical and biological insights from the international TARGIT-A randomised trial of targeted intraoperative radiotherapy during lumpectomy for breast cancer
AU - Vaidya, Jayant S.
AU - Bulsara, Max
AU - Baum, Michael
AU - Wenz, Frederik
AU - Massarut, Samuele
AU - Pigorsch, Steffi
AU - Alvarado, Michael
AU - Douek, Michael
AU - Saunders, Christobel
AU - Flyger, Henrik
AU - Eiermann, Wolfgang
AU - Brew-Graves, Chris
AU - Williams, Norman R.
AU - Potyka, Ingrid
AU - Roberts, Nicholas
AU - Bernstein, Marcelle
AU - Brown, Douglas
AU - Sperk, Elena
AU - Laws, Siobhan
AU - Sütterlin, Marc
AU - Corica, Tammy
AU - Lundgren, Steinar
AU - Holmes, Dennis
AU - Vinante, Lorenzo
AU - Bozza, Fernando
AU - Pazos, Montserrat
AU - Blanc-Onfroy, Magali Le
AU - Gruber, Günther
AU - Polkowski, Wojciech
AU - Dedes, Konstantin J.
AU - Niewald, Marcus
AU - Blohmer, Jens
AU - McReady, David
AU - Hoefer, Richard
AU - Kelemen, Pond
AU - Petralia, Gloria
AU - Falzon, Mary
AU - Joseph, David
AU - Tobias, Jeffrey S.
PY - 2021/8/3
Y1 - 2021/8/3
N2 - Background: The TARGIT-A trial reported risk-adapted targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT-IORT) during lumpectomy for breast cancer to be as effective as whole-breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Here, we present further detailed analyses. Methods: In total, 2298 women (≥45 years, invasive ductal carcinoma ≤3.5 cm, cN0–N1) were randomised. We investigated the impact of tumour size, grade, ER, PgR, HER2 and lymph node status on local recurrence-free survival, and of local recurrence on distant relapse and mortality. We analysed the predictive factors for recommending supplemental EBRT after TARGIT-IORT as part of the risk-adapted approach, using regression modelling. Non-breast cancer mortality was compared between TARGIT-IORT plus EBRT vs. EBRT. Results: Local recurrence-free survival was no different between TARGIT-IORT and EBRT, in every tumour subgroup. Unlike in the EBRT arm, local recurrence in the TARGIT-IORT arm was not a predictor of a higher risk of distant relapse or death. Our new predictive tool for recommending supplemental EBRT after TARGIT-IORT is at https://targit.org.uk/addrt. Non-breast cancer mortality was significantly lower in the TARGIT-IORT arm, even when patients received supplemental EBRT, HR 0.38 (95% CI 0.17–0.88) P = 0.0091. Conclusion: TARGIT-IORT is as effective as EBRT in all subgroups. Local recurrence after TARGIT-IORT, unlike after EBRT, has a good prognosis. TARGIT-IORT might have a beneficial abscopal effect. Trial registration: ISRCTN34086741 (21/7/2004), NCT00983684 (24/9/2009).
AB - Background: The TARGIT-A trial reported risk-adapted targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT-IORT) during lumpectomy for breast cancer to be as effective as whole-breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Here, we present further detailed analyses. Methods: In total, 2298 women (≥45 years, invasive ductal carcinoma ≤3.5 cm, cN0–N1) were randomised. We investigated the impact of tumour size, grade, ER, PgR, HER2 and lymph node status on local recurrence-free survival, and of local recurrence on distant relapse and mortality. We analysed the predictive factors for recommending supplemental EBRT after TARGIT-IORT as part of the risk-adapted approach, using regression modelling. Non-breast cancer mortality was compared between TARGIT-IORT plus EBRT vs. EBRT. Results: Local recurrence-free survival was no different between TARGIT-IORT and EBRT, in every tumour subgroup. Unlike in the EBRT arm, local recurrence in the TARGIT-IORT arm was not a predictor of a higher risk of distant relapse or death. Our new predictive tool for recommending supplemental EBRT after TARGIT-IORT is at https://targit.org.uk/addrt. Non-breast cancer mortality was significantly lower in the TARGIT-IORT arm, even when patients received supplemental EBRT, HR 0.38 (95% CI 0.17–0.88) P = 0.0091. Conclusion: TARGIT-IORT is as effective as EBRT in all subgroups. Local recurrence after TARGIT-IORT, unlike after EBRT, has a good prognosis. TARGIT-IORT might have a beneficial abscopal effect. Trial registration: ISRCTN34086741 (21/7/2004), NCT00983684 (24/9/2009).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106457037&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41416-021-01440-8
DO - 10.1038/s41416-021-01440-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 34035435
AN - SCOPUS:85106457037
SN - 0007-0920
VL - 125
SP - 380
EP - 389
JO - British Journal of Cancer
JF - British Journal of Cancer
IS - 3
ER -