TY - JOUR
T1 - Neuromechanical Consequences of Eccentric Load Reduction During the Performance of Weighted Jump Squats
AU - Zhang, Qian
AU - Zhang, Liang
AU - Yan, Bing
AU - Girard, Olivier
PY - 2023/3/1
Y1 - 2023/3/1
N2 - PURPOSE: To quantify the acute effects of a spectrum of eccentric load reductions on neuromechanical adjustments during the performance of weighted jump squats (WJSs). METHODS: On separate days, 16 well-trained participants performed WJS trials with various eccentric load reductions (0% [body mass only], 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% [standard WJS] of concentric load) with a mechanical braking unit, while concentric load was set at 30% of peak isometric squat force in all trials. A force platform and a motion-capture system were used to assess neuromuscular performance. RESULTS: Peak power output was 6.2% (4.7%) higher when load was reduced by 50% versus 0% (55.4 [7.8] vs 51.9 [7.6] W/kg; P = .001). Compared with no braking (0.326 [0.059] m), jump height was ∼13% to 17% higher for all eccentric load reduction conditions (all P < .001). Vertical ground reaction forces were progressively lower for 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% loading conditions (-22.1% [14.6%], -32.3% [10.8%], -42.0% [13.2%], and -46.1% [14.7%]; all P ≤ .001) in reference to body mass only. CONCLUSION: Eccentric load reduction is advantageous compared with traditional isoinertial loading for improving both jump height and peak power output during the concentric portion of maximal-effort WJS. This practice also decreases mechanical constraints in the lower extremities, which may become beneficial for load-compromised individuals.
AB - PURPOSE: To quantify the acute effects of a spectrum of eccentric load reductions on neuromechanical adjustments during the performance of weighted jump squats (WJSs). METHODS: On separate days, 16 well-trained participants performed WJS trials with various eccentric load reductions (0% [body mass only], 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% [standard WJS] of concentric load) with a mechanical braking unit, while concentric load was set at 30% of peak isometric squat force in all trials. A force platform and a motion-capture system were used to assess neuromuscular performance. RESULTS: Peak power output was 6.2% (4.7%) higher when load was reduced by 50% versus 0% (55.4 [7.8] vs 51.9 [7.6] W/kg; P = .001). Compared with no braking (0.326 [0.059] m), jump height was ∼13% to 17% higher for all eccentric load reduction conditions (all P < .001). Vertical ground reaction forces were progressively lower for 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% loading conditions (-22.1% [14.6%], -32.3% [10.8%], -42.0% [13.2%], and -46.1% [14.7%]; all P ≤ .001) in reference to body mass only. CONCLUSION: Eccentric load reduction is advantageous compared with traditional isoinertial loading for improving both jump height and peak power output during the concentric portion of maximal-effort WJS. This practice also decreases mechanical constraints in the lower extremities, which may become beneficial for load-compromised individuals.
KW - ballistic exercise
KW - landing impact
KW - optimal load
KW - plyometrics
KW - stretch-shortening cycle
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149181422&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1123/ijspp.2022-0248
DO - 10.1123/ijspp.2022-0248
M3 - Article
C2 - 36657466
AN - SCOPUS:85149181422
SN - 1555-0265
VL - 18
SP - 255
EP - 261
JO - International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
JF - International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
IS - 3
ER -