“Networked coalitions” as metropolitan governance: lessons from the emergence of Australia’s Committees for Cities and Regions

Thomas Sigler, Clare Mouat, Glen Searle, Kirsten Martinus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
227 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The continuous rescaling of metropolitan governance has been a prominent feature of the neoliberal state. Metropolitan coalitions are one variant of governance in which disparate actors are brought together around a common agenda or platform. Drawing upon the example of Australia’s Committees for Cities and Regions (CCRs), this article applies urban governance theory to better understand the effectiveness of networked metropolitan governance coalitions. We find that such coalitions derive political legitimacy from the externalities produced by their network relations, which we theorize as a three-dimensional nexus of vertical (between levels of government), horizontal (between local actors), and diagonal (with CCR counterparts) components. Although the CCR model is distinctive to Australia and New Zealand, it reflects similar networked and multiscalar processes at work elsewhere, serving as a template for political landscapes in which in-built legacy political arrangements largely preclude metropolitan-scale issues from being addressed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)182-200
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Urban Affairs
Volume43
Issue number1
Early online date11 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Networked coalitions” as metropolitan governance: lessons from the emergence of Australia’s Committees for Cities and Regions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this