Multiple methods in qualitative research with children: More insight or just more?

Philip Darbyshire, Colin MacDougall, Wendy Schiller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

557 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores the research implications of using multi-methods within a broad qualitative approach by drawing on the experience of conducting two childhood obesity-focused qualitative studies of Australian children's perceptions and experiences of place, space and physical activity. Children described and depicted their physical activities and experiences: in focus group interviews, by mapping their local, social and recreational spaces and by photographing their meaningful places, spaces and activities using a Photovoice approach. The authors describe, reflect on and critique their chosen research approach, discussing the value, utility and pitfalls associated with using multiple methods with children. The article concludes that using multiple methods in researching children's experiences is a valuable approach that does not merely duplicate data but also offers complementary insights and understandings that may be difficult to access through reliance on a single method of data collection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)417-436
Number of pages20
JournalQualitative Research
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multiple methods in qualitative research with children: More insight or just more?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this