Multiple breath washout quality control in the clinical setting

Bettina S. Frauchiger, Julia Carlens, Andreas Herger, Alexander Moeller, Philipp Latzin, Kathryn A. Ramsey

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    23 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: Multiple breath washout (MBW) is increasingly used in the clinical assessment of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Guidelines for MBW quality control (QC) were developed primarily for retrospective assessment and central overreading. We assessed whether real-time QC of MBW data during the measurement improves test acceptability in the clinical setting. Methods: We implemented standardized real-time QC and reporting of MBW data at the time of the measurement in the clinical pediatric lung function laboratory in Bern, Switzerland, in children with CF aged 4–18 years. We assessed MBW test acceptability before (31 tests; 89 trials) and after (32 tests; 96 trials) implementation of real-time QC and compared agreement between reviewers. Further, we assessed the implementation of real-time QC at a secondary center in Zurich, Switzerland. Results: Before the implementation of real-time QC in Bern, only 58% of clinical MBW tests were deemed acceptable following retrospective QC by an experienced reviewer. After the implementation of real-time QC, MBW test acceptability improved to 75% in Bern. In Zurich, after the implementation of real-time QC, test acceptability improved from 38% to 70%. Further, the agreement between MBW operators and an experienced reviewer for test acceptability was 84% in Bern and 93% in Zurich. Conclusion: Real-time QC of MBW data at the time of measurement is feasible in the clinical setting and results in improved test acceptability.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)105-112
    Number of pages8
    JournalPediatric Pulmonology
    Volume56
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2021

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Multiple breath washout quality control in the clinical setting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this