Movements of reef fishes across marine reserve boundaries: Effects of manipulating a density gradient

D. Zeller, S. L. Stoute, G. R. Russ

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Marine reserves should display net export of biomass if they are to be of use in fisheries management. We assessed experimentally the export of fish biomass ('spillover') from 2 marine reserves on the Great Barrier Reef. Using the mark-recapture technique with traps, and hook-and-line fishing, movements of serranids, lutjanids and lethrinids were monitored at 2 experimental and 2 control sites. Experimental sites were bisected by reserve boundaries into 'zones' open and closed to fishing. Control sites were protected from fishing, with an arbitrary boundary creating 2 equal zones. Between 1997 and 1999, 1374 individuals were externally tagged, and during 1999 densities were manipulated twice. Underwater visual census (UVC) surveys revealed pre-manipulation density gradients between zones that were weak at real boundaries, and stronger at the arbitrary control boundaries. Movements were highly localized, with over 60% of recaptures being made within the 50 x 30 m block of initial capture. The mean distances moved differed between the 3 species with the highest recapture rates: Plectropornus leopardus (Serranidae) moved distances >100 m, Lutjanus carponotatus (Lutjanidae) occasionally moved over 50 m, while Cephalopholis cyanostigma (Serranidae) was predominantly caught within the block of initial capture. Movements across real or control boundaries were rare. Twice in 1999, fish densities in zones open to fishing at the experimental sites were reduced by spearfishing (by 61 to 64% and 57 to 83%, respectively). UVC revealed density gradients at the experimental boundaries and no changes at non-manipulated control sites. There was no evidence of experimentally induced directional movements, using traps or hook-and-line sampling; however, 3 species (C. cyanostigma, L. carponotatus, L. quinquelineatus) did show a propensity for increased movements. Detection of spillover requires powerful sampling designs incorporating strong density gradients across large numbers of reserve boundaries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)269-280
Number of pages12
JournalMarine Ecology Progress Series
Volume254
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jun 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

marine park
edge effects
marine fish
reefs
reef
fish
Serranidae
fishing
Cephalopholis
traps
fishing line
Leopardus
Lutjanidae
Lutjanus
biomass
Great Barrier Reef
fisheries management
sampling
barrier reef
effect

Cite this

@article{9bb2bccf703045cc87b71688ce7bc425,
title = "Movements of reef fishes across marine reserve boundaries: Effects of manipulating a density gradient",
abstract = "Marine reserves should display net export of biomass if they are to be of use in fisheries management. We assessed experimentally the export of fish biomass ('spillover') from 2 marine reserves on the Great Barrier Reef. Using the mark-recapture technique with traps, and hook-and-line fishing, movements of serranids, lutjanids and lethrinids were monitored at 2 experimental and 2 control sites. Experimental sites were bisected by reserve boundaries into 'zones' open and closed to fishing. Control sites were protected from fishing, with an arbitrary boundary creating 2 equal zones. Between 1997 and 1999, 1374 individuals were externally tagged, and during 1999 densities were manipulated twice. Underwater visual census (UVC) surveys revealed pre-manipulation density gradients between zones that were weak at real boundaries, and stronger at the arbitrary control boundaries. Movements were highly localized, with over 60{\%} of recaptures being made within the 50 x 30 m block of initial capture. The mean distances moved differed between the 3 species with the highest recapture rates: Plectropornus leopardus (Serranidae) moved distances >100 m, Lutjanus carponotatus (Lutjanidae) occasionally moved over 50 m, while Cephalopholis cyanostigma (Serranidae) was predominantly caught within the block of initial capture. Movements across real or control boundaries were rare. Twice in 1999, fish densities in zones open to fishing at the experimental sites were reduced by spearfishing (by 61 to 64{\%} and 57 to 83{\%}, respectively). UVC revealed density gradients at the experimental boundaries and no changes at non-manipulated control sites. There was no evidence of experimentally induced directional movements, using traps or hook-and-line sampling; however, 3 species (C. cyanostigma, L. carponotatus, L. quinquelineatus) did show a propensity for increased movements. Detection of spillover requires powerful sampling designs incorporating strong density gradients across large numbers of reserve boundaries.",
keywords = "Coral reefs, Experiment, Fisheries management, Marine reserves, Movements, Spillover, Tagging",
author = "D. Zeller and Stoute, {S. L.} and Russ, {G. R.}",
year = "2003",
month = "6",
day = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "254",
pages = "269--280",
journal = "Marine Ecology - Progress Series",
issn = "0171-8630",
publisher = "Inter-Research",

}

Movements of reef fishes across marine reserve boundaries : Effects of manipulating a density gradient. / Zeller, D.; Stoute, S. L.; Russ, G. R.

In: Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 254, 03.06.2003, p. 269-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Movements of reef fishes across marine reserve boundaries

T2 - Effects of manipulating a density gradient

AU - Zeller, D.

AU - Stoute, S. L.

AU - Russ, G. R.

PY - 2003/6/3

Y1 - 2003/6/3

N2 - Marine reserves should display net export of biomass if they are to be of use in fisheries management. We assessed experimentally the export of fish biomass ('spillover') from 2 marine reserves on the Great Barrier Reef. Using the mark-recapture technique with traps, and hook-and-line fishing, movements of serranids, lutjanids and lethrinids were monitored at 2 experimental and 2 control sites. Experimental sites were bisected by reserve boundaries into 'zones' open and closed to fishing. Control sites were protected from fishing, with an arbitrary boundary creating 2 equal zones. Between 1997 and 1999, 1374 individuals were externally tagged, and during 1999 densities were manipulated twice. Underwater visual census (UVC) surveys revealed pre-manipulation density gradients between zones that were weak at real boundaries, and stronger at the arbitrary control boundaries. Movements were highly localized, with over 60% of recaptures being made within the 50 x 30 m block of initial capture. The mean distances moved differed between the 3 species with the highest recapture rates: Plectropornus leopardus (Serranidae) moved distances >100 m, Lutjanus carponotatus (Lutjanidae) occasionally moved over 50 m, while Cephalopholis cyanostigma (Serranidae) was predominantly caught within the block of initial capture. Movements across real or control boundaries were rare. Twice in 1999, fish densities in zones open to fishing at the experimental sites were reduced by spearfishing (by 61 to 64% and 57 to 83%, respectively). UVC revealed density gradients at the experimental boundaries and no changes at non-manipulated control sites. There was no evidence of experimentally induced directional movements, using traps or hook-and-line sampling; however, 3 species (C. cyanostigma, L. carponotatus, L. quinquelineatus) did show a propensity for increased movements. Detection of spillover requires powerful sampling designs incorporating strong density gradients across large numbers of reserve boundaries.

AB - Marine reserves should display net export of biomass if they are to be of use in fisheries management. We assessed experimentally the export of fish biomass ('spillover') from 2 marine reserves on the Great Barrier Reef. Using the mark-recapture technique with traps, and hook-and-line fishing, movements of serranids, lutjanids and lethrinids were monitored at 2 experimental and 2 control sites. Experimental sites were bisected by reserve boundaries into 'zones' open and closed to fishing. Control sites were protected from fishing, with an arbitrary boundary creating 2 equal zones. Between 1997 and 1999, 1374 individuals were externally tagged, and during 1999 densities were manipulated twice. Underwater visual census (UVC) surveys revealed pre-manipulation density gradients between zones that were weak at real boundaries, and stronger at the arbitrary control boundaries. Movements were highly localized, with over 60% of recaptures being made within the 50 x 30 m block of initial capture. The mean distances moved differed between the 3 species with the highest recapture rates: Plectropornus leopardus (Serranidae) moved distances >100 m, Lutjanus carponotatus (Lutjanidae) occasionally moved over 50 m, while Cephalopholis cyanostigma (Serranidae) was predominantly caught within the block of initial capture. Movements across real or control boundaries were rare. Twice in 1999, fish densities in zones open to fishing at the experimental sites were reduced by spearfishing (by 61 to 64% and 57 to 83%, respectively). UVC revealed density gradients at the experimental boundaries and no changes at non-manipulated control sites. There was no evidence of experimentally induced directional movements, using traps or hook-and-line sampling; however, 3 species (C. cyanostigma, L. carponotatus, L. quinquelineatus) did show a propensity for increased movements. Detection of spillover requires powerful sampling designs incorporating strong density gradients across large numbers of reserve boundaries.

KW - Coral reefs

KW - Experiment

KW - Fisheries management

KW - Marine reserves

KW - Movements

KW - Spillover

KW - Tagging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038039528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 254

SP - 269

EP - 280

JO - Marine Ecology - Progress Series

JF - Marine Ecology - Progress Series

SN - 0171-8630

ER -