Morphological number counts and redshift distributions to I = 25 from the hubble deep fields: Constraints on cosmological models from early-type galaxies

S. Phillipps, S. P. Driver, Warrick J. Couch, A. Fernandez-Soto, P. D. Bristow, S. C. Odewahn, R. A. Windhorst, K. Lanzetta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We combine magnitude and photometric redshift data on galaxies in the Hubble Deep Fields with morphological classifications in order to separate out the distributions for early-type galaxies. The updated morphological galaxy number counts down to I = 25 and the corresponding redshift distributions are used as joint constraints on cosmological models; in particular, on the values of the density parameter Ω0 and the normalized cosmological constant λ0. We find that an Einstein-de Sitter universe with simple passive evolution gives an excellent fit to the counts and redshift data at all magnitudes. An open, low-Ω0 model with no net evolution (and conservation of the number of ellipticals), which fits the counts equally well, is somewhat less successful, predicting slightly lower mean redshifts and, more significantly, the lack of a high-z tail. A number-conserving model with a dominant contribution from λ0, on the other hand, is far less successful, predicting a much narrower distribution than is seen. More complex models are obviously possible, but we conclude that if large-scale transmutation between types does not occur, then the lambda-dominated models provide a very poor fit to the current data.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)807-812
Number of pages6
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume319
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Dec 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Morphological number counts and redshift distributions to I = 25 from the hubble deep fields: Constraints on cosmological models from early-type galaxies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this