TY - JOUR
T1 - Modeling the Antecedents of Proactive Behavior at Work
AU - Parker, Sharon
AU - Williams, H.M.
AU - Turner, N.
PY - 2006/5/1
Y1 - 2006/5/1
N2 - Using a sample of U.K. wire makers (N = 282), the authors tested a model in which personality and work environment antecedents affect proactive work behavior via cognitive-motivational mechanisms. Self-reported proactive work behaviors (proactive idea implementation and proactive problem solving) were validated against rater assessments for a subsample (n = 60) of wire makers. With the exception of supportive supervision, each antecedent was important, albeit through different processes. Proactive personality was significantly associated with proactive work behavior via role breadth self-efficacy and flexible role orientation, job autonomy was also linked to proactive behavior via these processes, as well as directly; and coworker trust was associated with proactive behavior via flexible role orientation. In further support of the model, the cognitive-motivational processes for proactive work behavior differed from those for the more passive outcome of generalized compliance. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
AB - Using a sample of U.K. wire makers (N = 282), the authors tested a model in which personality and work environment antecedents affect proactive work behavior via cognitive-motivational mechanisms. Self-reported proactive work behaviors (proactive idea implementation and proactive problem solving) were validated against rater assessments for a subsample (n = 60) of wire makers. With the exception of supportive supervision, each antecedent was important, albeit through different processes. Proactive personality was significantly associated with proactive work behavior via role breadth self-efficacy and flexible role orientation, job autonomy was also linked to proactive behavior via these processes, as well as directly; and coworker trust was associated with proactive behavior via flexible role orientation. In further support of the model, the cognitive-motivational processes for proactive work behavior differed from those for the more passive outcome of generalized compliance. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33745326328
U2 - 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
DO - 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
M3 - Article
C2 - 16737360
SN - 0021-9010
VL - 91
SP - 636
EP - 652
JO - Journal of Applied Psychology
JF - Journal of Applied Psychology
IS - 3
ER -