TY - JOUR
T1 - Mixed-list phonological similarity effects in delayed serial recall
AU - Farrell, Simon
PY - 2006/11
Y1 - 2006/11
N2 - Recent experiments have shown that placing dissimilar items on lists of phonologically similar items enhances accuracy of ordered recall of the dissimilar items [Farrell, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2003). Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 838-849.]. Two explanations have been offered for this effect: an encoding explanation, in which items similar to current memory contents are given less encoding weight and offer less competition for recall; and a retrieval explanation, which suggests that the long-term similarity structure of the items leads to dissimilar items being more distinct on mixed lists. These theories are compared in an experiment in which a filled delay was introduced between study and test. Simulations show the prominent enhancing effects of similarity after a delay are captured by a model that assumes encoding is sensitive to the similarity of items to other list items [Farrell, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2002). An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 59-79.], but are not handled by a retrieval model [the Start-End Model; Henson, R. N. A. (1998). Short-term memory for serial order: the Start-End Model. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 73-137.]. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
AB - Recent experiments have shown that placing dissimilar items on lists of phonologically similar items enhances accuracy of ordered recall of the dissimilar items [Farrell, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2003). Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 838-849.]. Two explanations have been offered for this effect: an encoding explanation, in which items similar to current memory contents are given less encoding weight and offer less competition for recall; and a retrieval explanation, which suggests that the long-term similarity structure of the items leads to dissimilar items being more distinct on mixed lists. These theories are compared in an experiment in which a filled delay was introduced between study and test. Simulations show the prominent enhancing effects of similarity after a delay are captured by a model that assumes encoding is sensitive to the similarity of items to other list items [Farrell, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2002). An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 59-79.], but are not handled by a retrieval model [the Start-End Model; Henson, R. N. A. (1998). Short-term memory for serial order: the Start-End Model. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 73-137.]. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
KW - serial recall
KW - memory
KW - computational modelling
KW - start-end model
KW - serial-order-in-a-box
KW - phonological similarity
KW - SHORT-TERM-MEMORY
KW - ACOUSTIC SIMILARITY
KW - IMMEDIATE MEMORY
KW - NETWORK MODEL
KW - ORDER
KW - REDINTEGRATION
KW - CONFUSIONS
KW - SPEECH
U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.002
M3 - Article
SN - 0749-596X
VL - 55
SP - 587
EP - 600
JO - Journal of Memory and Language
JF - Journal of Memory and Language
IS - 4
ER -