Missing the marine forest for the trees

Thomas Wernberg, Karen Filbee-Dexter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Seascapes dominated by large, structurally complex seaweeds are ubiquitous. These critical ecosystems are under increasing pressure from human activities, and conceiving successful management strategies to ensure their persistence and/or recovery is of paramount importance. Currently, ecosystems dominated by large seaweeds are referred to as either 'forests' or 'beds'. We demonstrate how this dual terminology is confusing, is used inconsistently, and reduces the efficiency of communication about the importance and perils of seaweed habitats. As a consequence, it undermines work to alleviate and mitigate their loss and impedes research on unifying principles in ecology. We conclude that there are clear benefits of simply using the more intuitive term 'forest' to describe all seascapes dominated by habitat-forming seaweeds. This is particularly true as researchers scramble to reconcile ecological functions and patterns of change across disparate regions and species to match the increasingly global scale of environmental forcing on these critical ecosystems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209-215
Number of pages7
JournalMarine Ecology Progress Series
Volume612
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Mar 2019

Cite this

Wernberg, Thomas ; Filbee-Dexter, Karen. / Missing the marine forest for the trees. In: Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2019 ; Vol. 612. pp. 209-215.
@article{3ef8353a93624cd2b3a6526bd2604eec,
title = "Missing the marine forest for the trees",
abstract = "Seascapes dominated by large, structurally complex seaweeds are ubiquitous. These critical ecosystems are under increasing pressure from human activities, and conceiving successful management strategies to ensure their persistence and/or recovery is of paramount importance. Currently, ecosystems dominated by large seaweeds are referred to as either 'forests' or 'beds'. We demonstrate how this dual terminology is confusing, is used inconsistently, and reduces the efficiency of communication about the importance and perils of seaweed habitats. As a consequence, it undermines work to alleviate and mitigate their loss and impedes research on unifying principles in ecology. We conclude that there are clear benefits of simply using the more intuitive term 'forest' to describe all seascapes dominated by habitat-forming seaweeds. This is particularly true as researchers scramble to reconcile ecological functions and patterns of change across disparate regions and species to match the increasingly global scale of environmental forcing on these critical ecosystems.",
keywords = "Seaweed, Terminology, Kelp, Macroalgae, Communication, KELP FORESTS, BLUE CARBON, CANOPY, DIVERSITY, RECRUITMENT, UNDERSTORY, STABILITY, COMMUNITY, ALGAE, SCALE",
author = "Thomas Wernberg and Karen Filbee-Dexter",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "7",
doi = "10.3354/meps12867",
language = "English",
volume = "612",
pages = "209--215",
journal = "Marine Ecology - Progress Series",
issn = "0171-8630",
publisher = "Inter-Research",

}

Missing the marine forest for the trees. / Wernberg, Thomas; Filbee-Dexter, Karen.

In: Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 612, 07.03.2019, p. 209-215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Missing the marine forest for the trees

AU - Wernberg, Thomas

AU - Filbee-Dexter, Karen

PY - 2019/3/7

Y1 - 2019/3/7

N2 - Seascapes dominated by large, structurally complex seaweeds are ubiquitous. These critical ecosystems are under increasing pressure from human activities, and conceiving successful management strategies to ensure their persistence and/or recovery is of paramount importance. Currently, ecosystems dominated by large seaweeds are referred to as either 'forests' or 'beds'. We demonstrate how this dual terminology is confusing, is used inconsistently, and reduces the efficiency of communication about the importance and perils of seaweed habitats. As a consequence, it undermines work to alleviate and mitigate their loss and impedes research on unifying principles in ecology. We conclude that there are clear benefits of simply using the more intuitive term 'forest' to describe all seascapes dominated by habitat-forming seaweeds. This is particularly true as researchers scramble to reconcile ecological functions and patterns of change across disparate regions and species to match the increasingly global scale of environmental forcing on these critical ecosystems.

AB - Seascapes dominated by large, structurally complex seaweeds are ubiquitous. These critical ecosystems are under increasing pressure from human activities, and conceiving successful management strategies to ensure their persistence and/or recovery is of paramount importance. Currently, ecosystems dominated by large seaweeds are referred to as either 'forests' or 'beds'. We demonstrate how this dual terminology is confusing, is used inconsistently, and reduces the efficiency of communication about the importance and perils of seaweed habitats. As a consequence, it undermines work to alleviate and mitigate their loss and impedes research on unifying principles in ecology. We conclude that there are clear benefits of simply using the more intuitive term 'forest' to describe all seascapes dominated by habitat-forming seaweeds. This is particularly true as researchers scramble to reconcile ecological functions and patterns of change across disparate regions and species to match the increasingly global scale of environmental forcing on these critical ecosystems.

KW - Seaweed

KW - Terminology

KW - Kelp

KW - Macroalgae

KW - Communication

KW - KELP FORESTS

KW - BLUE CARBON

KW - CANOPY

KW - DIVERSITY

KW - RECRUITMENT

KW - UNDERSTORY

KW - STABILITY

KW - COMMUNITY

KW - ALGAE

KW - SCALE

U2 - 10.3354/meps12867

DO - 10.3354/meps12867

M3 - Article

VL - 612

SP - 209

EP - 215

JO - Marine Ecology - Progress Series

JF - Marine Ecology - Progress Series

SN - 0171-8630

ER -