Migration and Growth in China: A Sceptical Assessment of the Evidence

Longfeng Ye, Peter Robertson

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Numerous studies report the growth effects from labor reallocation in China to be in the order of 1 to 2 percentage points per year, which would appear to be a signif-icant fraction of China’s per capita income growth. We show that the total factor productivity gains are an order of magnitude smaller, at only 0.25 percentage points per year. There are two reasons for this difference. First, the majority of stud-ies have used a decomposition method that effectively assumes linear production functions. This results in values that are much larger than the more appropriate Denison-Kuznets method. Second we also allow for sectoral differences in human capital. We conclude that the gains from labor reallocation may have been a far less important source of China’s growth than is conventionally thought.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherUWA Business School
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Publication series

NameEconomics Discussion Papers
No.3
Volume17

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Migration and Growth in China: A Sceptical Assessment of the Evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this