Migrant and mainstream perspectives on buying national: An Australian case study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In a globalising world, people might be expected to be less nationalistic about their personal consumption decisions. Yet support for Trump-style protectionism and ‘buy national’ campaigns appears to be spreading. How do people talk about such purchasing decisions? Applying thematic content analysis and discourse analysis to qualitative data from 27 focus groups (n = 223) conducted across Australia, this article explores the key features of discussions about ‘buying Australian’, comparing migrant/ethnic minority responses with non-migrant/mainstream responses. Perhaps surprisingly, migrants adopt the taken-for-granted imperative that nationalist consumption is good for the national economy, and articulate this choice as a demonstration of loyalty and reciprocity to their adopted country. Perhaps counter to expectations, mainstream participants are far more ambivalent in the ways they express this nationalist imperative. While nationalist consumption remains the bottom line as the appropriate purchasing orientation, their position as charter group enables them to offer more critical arguments about the authenticity of the ‘Australian-made’ logo and the quality and price of goods. For both, however, the taken-for-granted default position is that consumer nationalism is ‘the right thing to do’. Buying national is thus an instance of what Billig identified as ‘banal nationalism’, where the nation-state, as opposed to other collectives such as ‘workers’ or ‘global citizens’, is reproduced as the appropriate category for identification and collective responsibility.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-20
JournalJournal of Consumer Culture
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 15 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

Focus Groups
migrant
nationalism
protectionism
national economy
reciprocity
charter
loyalty
authenticity
discourse analysis
national minority
nation state
content analysis
Group
campaign
citizen
worker
responsibility
Migrants
Nationalists

Cite this

@article{e45eadf6670846088e2532353dd3e5f2,
title = "Migrant and mainstream perspectives on buying national: An Australian case study",
abstract = "In a globalising world, people might be expected to be less nationalistic about their personal consumption decisions. Yet support for Trump-style protectionism and ‘buy national’ campaigns appears to be spreading. How do people talk about such purchasing decisions? Applying thematic content analysis and discourse analysis to qualitative data from 27 focus groups (n = 223) conducted across Australia, this article explores the key features of discussions about ‘buying Australian’, comparing migrant/ethnic minority responses with non-migrant/mainstream responses. Perhaps surprisingly, migrants adopt the taken-for-granted imperative that nationalist consumption is good for the national economy, and articulate this choice as a demonstration of loyalty and reciprocity to their adopted country. Perhaps counter to expectations, mainstream participants are far more ambivalent in the ways they express this nationalist imperative. While nationalist consumption remains the bottom line as the appropriate purchasing orientation, their position as charter group enables them to offer more critical arguments about the authenticity of the ‘Australian-made’ logo and the quality and price of goods. For both, however, the taken-for-granted default position is that consumer nationalism is ‘the right thing to do’. Buying national is thus an instance of what Billig identified as ‘banal nationalism’, where the nation-state, as opposed to other collectives such as ‘workers’ or ‘global citizens’, is reproduced as the appropriate category for identification and collective responsibility.",
keywords = "Consumer ethnocentrism, consumer nationalism, consumer patriotism, cosmopolitan, nation branding, nationalism, politically motivated consumption, protectionism",
author = "Farida Fozdar",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1177/1469540518806960",
language = "English",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Culture",
issn = "1469-5405",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

Migrant and mainstream perspectives on buying national : An Australian case study. / Fozdar, Farida.

In: Journal of Consumer Culture, 15.11.2018, p. 1-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Migrant and mainstream perspectives on buying national

T2 - An Australian case study

AU - Fozdar, Farida

PY - 2018/11/15

Y1 - 2018/11/15

N2 - In a globalising world, people might be expected to be less nationalistic about their personal consumption decisions. Yet support for Trump-style protectionism and ‘buy national’ campaigns appears to be spreading. How do people talk about such purchasing decisions? Applying thematic content analysis and discourse analysis to qualitative data from 27 focus groups (n = 223) conducted across Australia, this article explores the key features of discussions about ‘buying Australian’, comparing migrant/ethnic minority responses with non-migrant/mainstream responses. Perhaps surprisingly, migrants adopt the taken-for-granted imperative that nationalist consumption is good for the national economy, and articulate this choice as a demonstration of loyalty and reciprocity to their adopted country. Perhaps counter to expectations, mainstream participants are far more ambivalent in the ways they express this nationalist imperative. While nationalist consumption remains the bottom line as the appropriate purchasing orientation, their position as charter group enables them to offer more critical arguments about the authenticity of the ‘Australian-made’ logo and the quality and price of goods. For both, however, the taken-for-granted default position is that consumer nationalism is ‘the right thing to do’. Buying national is thus an instance of what Billig identified as ‘banal nationalism’, where the nation-state, as opposed to other collectives such as ‘workers’ or ‘global citizens’, is reproduced as the appropriate category for identification and collective responsibility.

AB - In a globalising world, people might be expected to be less nationalistic about their personal consumption decisions. Yet support for Trump-style protectionism and ‘buy national’ campaigns appears to be spreading. How do people talk about such purchasing decisions? Applying thematic content analysis and discourse analysis to qualitative data from 27 focus groups (n = 223) conducted across Australia, this article explores the key features of discussions about ‘buying Australian’, comparing migrant/ethnic minority responses with non-migrant/mainstream responses. Perhaps surprisingly, migrants adopt the taken-for-granted imperative that nationalist consumption is good for the national economy, and articulate this choice as a demonstration of loyalty and reciprocity to their adopted country. Perhaps counter to expectations, mainstream participants are far more ambivalent in the ways they express this nationalist imperative. While nationalist consumption remains the bottom line as the appropriate purchasing orientation, their position as charter group enables them to offer more critical arguments about the authenticity of the ‘Australian-made’ logo and the quality and price of goods. For both, however, the taken-for-granted default position is that consumer nationalism is ‘the right thing to do’. Buying national is thus an instance of what Billig identified as ‘banal nationalism’, where the nation-state, as opposed to other collectives such as ‘workers’ or ‘global citizens’, is reproduced as the appropriate category for identification and collective responsibility.

KW - Consumer ethnocentrism

KW - consumer nationalism

KW - consumer patriotism

KW - cosmopolitan

KW - nation branding

KW - nationalism

KW - politically motivated consumption

KW - protectionism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058651008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1469540518806960

DO - 10.1177/1469540518806960

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Journal of Consumer Culture

JF - Journal of Consumer Culture

SN - 1469-5405

ER -