Metformin and cancer-specific survival among breast, colorectal, or endometrial cancer patients: A nationwide data linkage study

Jia Li Feng, Xiwen Qin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: Equivocal results of association between metformin and cancer-specific survival need more investigation. We tested the hypothesis that adherence to the drug had a lower cancer-specific mortality in a homogeneous population (i.e. regular users). Methods: The Australian Cancer database was linked to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme data and the National Death Index. Adherence to metformin was calculated by proportion of days covered. Cox regression models with time-varying covariates were used to estimate multivariable-adjusted cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of adherence to metformin and cancer-specific mortality. Results: Between 2003 and 2013, three separate cohorts of 6717, 3121, and 1854 female patients were identified with newly diagnosed breast, colorectal, or endometrial cancer. The 1-year adherence was similar at baseline in three cohorts, on average 75%. Each 10% increase in 1-year adherence to metformin reduced cancer-specific mortality among women with breast cancer (adjusted HR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93–0.97), colorectal cancer (adjusted HR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91–0.96), or endometrial cancer (adjusted HR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90–0.99). The inverse associations remained unchanged in most subgroup analyses. Conclusions: Among metformin users, adherence to this drug is inversely associated with reduced cancer-specific mortality. If confirmed, metformin could be considered as an adjuvant treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Article number108755
JournalDiabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Volume175
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Metformin and cancer-specific survival among breast, colorectal, or endometrial cancer patients: A nationwide data linkage study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this