TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanical performance and durability of geopolymer lightweight rubber concrete
AU - Youssf, Osama
AU - Elchalakani, Mohamed
AU - Hassanli, Reza
AU - Roychand, Rajeev
AU - Zhuge, Yan
AU - Gravina, Rebecca J.
AU - Mills, Julie E.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge the donation of the following: sand by Rocla Golden Grove Quarry, stone by Jennings Rosedale Quarry, cement by Adelaide Brighton Cement Pty. Ltd. rubber aggregate by Tyrecycle Pty. Ltd. fly-ash by Flyash Australia Pty. Ltd. ground granulated blast furnace slag by Independent Cement & Lime Pty. Ltd. silica fume by Xypex Australia Pty. Ltd. The authors also acknowledge the contributions of Mr. Tim Golding, Mrs. Michelle Plew, Mr. Craig Sweetman, and the following Honours' students who assisted in the experimental work reported in this paper: Jessica Taddeo, Chunyue Wang, Jing Sun, and Peizuo Zou.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - This research focuses on producing and testing a type of geopolymer concrete as an alternative to the conventional Portland cement concrete. The proposed concrete incorporates lightweight expanded clay aggregate (LECA) and rubber from car tyre waste which results in the production of a new concrete: “geopolymer LECA-Rubcrete”. A total of ten geopolymer concrete mixes were produced using rubber and LECA as partial replacements of fine and coarse aggregates, respectively. Variables such as the ratio of geopolymer binders, LECA pre-treatment, concrete curing method, and mixing procedures were examined. Physical, mechanical, and durability tests were conducted including workability, compressive strength, drying shrinkage, water absorption, surface abrasion, and carbonation. This research aimed to provide the necessary information needed to develop lightweight geopolymer Rubcrete structures to reduce carbon emissions and move a step closer towards a greener future. The results indicated that lightweight geopolymer Rubcrete is a suitable alternative to lightweight conventional concrete with similar or better durability properties. The workability increased by 9% and 20% when using rubber and LECA, respectively; however, the compressive strength decreased by 32% and 67%, respectively. Using 25% slag to 75% fly-ash decreased the workability by 44% and increased the strength by 47%. Specimens cured in the ambient condition showed less strength compared to those cured in water. Heat + water curing showed less strength in all mixes, except in mixes with no lightweight materials and with high fly-ash content, which showed 16–21% strength increase. Of the tested mixes, geopolymer LECA-Rubcrete mix that has high slag content showed comparable or better performance than that showed by Portland cement LECA-Rubcrete mix in all measured characteristics.
AB - This research focuses on producing and testing a type of geopolymer concrete as an alternative to the conventional Portland cement concrete. The proposed concrete incorporates lightweight expanded clay aggregate (LECA) and rubber from car tyre waste which results in the production of a new concrete: “geopolymer LECA-Rubcrete”. A total of ten geopolymer concrete mixes were produced using rubber and LECA as partial replacements of fine and coarse aggregates, respectively. Variables such as the ratio of geopolymer binders, LECA pre-treatment, concrete curing method, and mixing procedures were examined. Physical, mechanical, and durability tests were conducted including workability, compressive strength, drying shrinkage, water absorption, surface abrasion, and carbonation. This research aimed to provide the necessary information needed to develop lightweight geopolymer Rubcrete structures to reduce carbon emissions and move a step closer towards a greener future. The results indicated that lightweight geopolymer Rubcrete is a suitable alternative to lightweight conventional concrete with similar or better durability properties. The workability increased by 9% and 20% when using rubber and LECA, respectively; however, the compressive strength decreased by 32% and 67%, respectively. Using 25% slag to 75% fly-ash decreased the workability by 44% and increased the strength by 47%. Specimens cured in the ambient condition showed less strength compared to those cured in water. Heat + water curing showed less strength in all mixes, except in mixes with no lightweight materials and with high fly-ash content, which showed 16–21% strength increase. Of the tested mixes, geopolymer LECA-Rubcrete mix that has high slag content showed comparable or better performance than that showed by Portland cement LECA-Rubcrete mix in all measured characteristics.
KW - Durability
KW - Fly-ash
KW - Geopolymer concrete
KW - Lightweight concrete
KW - Rubberized concrete
KW - Slag
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118933840&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103608
DO - 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103608
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85118933840
SN - 2352-7102
VL - 45
JO - Journal of Building Engineering
JF - Journal of Building Engineering
M1 - 103608
ER -