Abstract
general population samples. Conclusions: The findings provided preliminary support for validity and reliability of the scores derived from Persian version of the PTQ.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 101-109 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Personality and Individual Differences |
Volume | 148 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2019 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Measuring repetitive thinking in Iran : Psychometric properties of Persian version of Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire. / Kami, Maryam; Moloodi, Reza; Mazidi Sharafabadi, Mahdi; Ehring, Thomas; Khaje-Mansoori, Amin; Bakhshi Nodooshan, Mojgan; Mazinani, Zahra; Molavi, Mohammad-Reza; Momeni, Fereshte.
In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 148, 01.10.2019, p. 101-109.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring repetitive thinking in Iran
T2 - Psychometric properties of Persian version of Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire
AU - Kami, Maryam
AU - Moloodi, Reza
AU - Mazidi Sharafabadi, Mahdi
AU - Ehring, Thomas
AU - Khaje-Mansoori, Amin
AU - Bakhshi Nodooshan, Mojgan
AU - Mazinani, Zahra
AU - Molavi, Mohammad-Reza
AU - Momeni, Fereshte
PY - 2019/10/1
Y1 - 2019/10/1
N2 - Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the factor structure as well as the validity and reliability of the Persian version of Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire (PTQ). Method: Data were collected in three samples. A student sample (N=894) completed the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) and the PTQ. Participants from the general population (N=252) filled out a battery of questionnaires including the Penn State Worry questionnaire (PSWQ), the Ruminative response scale (RRS), the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) and the PTQ. Finally, psychotic inpatients (N=193) filled in the PTQ, only. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the second-order model with three lower-order factors model showed adequate fit with the data in all three samples. In addition, the PTQ had good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. As to validity, the PTQ scores showed positive correlation with the PSWQ, RRS, DERS, GAD-7 and DASS-21. In addition, the PTQ was found to discriminate the clinical sample from student andgeneral population samples. Conclusions: The findings provided preliminary support for validity and reliability of the scores derived from Persian version of the PTQ.
AB - Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the factor structure as well as the validity and reliability of the Persian version of Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire (PTQ). Method: Data were collected in three samples. A student sample (N=894) completed the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) and the PTQ. Participants from the general population (N=252) filled out a battery of questionnaires including the Penn State Worry questionnaire (PSWQ), the Ruminative response scale (RRS), the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) and the PTQ. Finally, psychotic inpatients (N=193) filled in the PTQ, only. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the second-order model with three lower-order factors model showed adequate fit with the data in all three samples. In addition, the PTQ had good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. As to validity, the PTQ scores showed positive correlation with the PSWQ, RRS, DERS, GAD-7 and DASS-21. In addition, the PTQ was found to discriminate the clinical sample from student andgeneral population samples. Conclusions: The findings provided preliminary support for validity and reliability of the scores derived from Persian version of the PTQ.
U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.012
DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.012
M3 - Article
VL - 148
SP - 101
EP - 109
JO - Personality and Individual Differences
JF - Personality and Individual Differences
SN - 0191-8869
ER -