TY - JOUR
T1 - Matter in the Beam: Weak Lensing, Substructures, and the Temperature of Dark Matter
AU - Mahdi, Hareth S.
AU - Elahi, Pascal J.
AU - Lewis, Geraint F.
AU - Power, Chris
PY - 2016/8/1
Y1 - 2016/8/1
N2 - Warm dark matter (WDM) models offer an attractive alternative to the
current cold dark matter (CDM) cosmological model. We present a novel
method to differentiate between WDM and CDM cosmologies, namely, using
weak lensing; this provides a unique probe as it is sensitive to all of
the “matter in the beam,” not just dark matter haloes and
the galaxies that reside in them, but also the diffuse material between
haloes. We compare the weak lensing maps of CDM clusters to those in a
WDM model corresponding to a thermally produced 0.5 keV dark matter
particle. Our analysis clearly shows that the weak lensing
magnification, convergence, and shear distributions can be used to
distinguish between CDM and WDM models. WDM models increase the
probability of weak magnifications, with the differences being
significant to ≳5σ, while leaving no significant imprint on
the shear distribution. WDM clusters analyzed in this work are more
homogeneous than CDM ones, and the fractional decrease in the amount of
material in haloes is proportional to the average increase in the
magnification. This difference arises from matter that would be bound in
compact haloes in CDM being smoothly distributed over much larger
volumes at lower densities in WDM. Moreover, the signature does not
solely lie in the probability distribution function but in the full
spatial distribution of the convergence field.
AB - Warm dark matter (WDM) models offer an attractive alternative to the
current cold dark matter (CDM) cosmological model. We present a novel
method to differentiate between WDM and CDM cosmologies, namely, using
weak lensing; this provides a unique probe as it is sensitive to all of
the “matter in the beam,” not just dark matter haloes and
the galaxies that reside in them, but also the diffuse material between
haloes. We compare the weak lensing maps of CDM clusters to those in a
WDM model corresponding to a thermally produced 0.5 keV dark matter
particle. Our analysis clearly shows that the weak lensing
magnification, convergence, and shear distributions can be used to
distinguish between CDM and WDM models. WDM models increase the
probability of weak magnifications, with the differences being
significant to ≳5σ, while leaving no significant imprint on
the shear distribution. WDM clusters analyzed in this work are more
homogeneous than CDM ones, and the fractional decrease in the amount of
material in haloes is proportional to the average increase in the
magnification. This difference arises from matter that would be bound in
compact haloes in CDM being smoothly distributed over much larger
volumes at lower densities in WDM. Moreover, the signature does not
solely lie in the probability distribution function but in the full
spatial distribution of the convergence field.
KW - cosmology: theory
KW - dark matter
KW - galaxies: clusters: general
KW - gravitational lensing: weak
KW - methods: numerical
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84982216576&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=
U2 - 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/212
DO - 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/212
M3 - Article
VL - 826
SP - 212
JO - The Astrophysical Journal
JF - The Astrophysical Journal
SN - 0004-637X
IS - 2
M1 - 212
ER -