Mandatory vaccination and no fault vaccine injury compensation schemes: An identification of country-level policies

Katie Attwell, Shevaun Drislane, Julie Leask

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: To prevent the spread of infectious diseases, governments have implemented a number of policies, including a range of mandatory vaccination policies. In addition, some governments have implemented no fault vaccine injury compensation schemes as a legal mechanism of recourse for individuals experiencing adverse events following vaccination. We aimed to identify countries with mandatory vaccination policies that also have no fault compensation schemes. Methods: To identify countries with mandatory childhood vaccination policies, we utilized existing publications, lists and databases, also conducting multiple country searches and policy detail verification. We then investigated compensation schemes for each country with childhood vaccination mandates, using an existing study and database/internet searches. Results: Of the 62 countries we identified with mandatory childhood vaccination policies, we found evidence that only 7 (11%) had also implemented no fault compensation schemes. Conclusions: No-fault compensation schemes are one government approach to address unintended consequences of vaccination. Few countries have implemented these schemes, including those with mandatory vaccination policies. Mandatory vaccination invokes a strong need to protect those who fall victim to extremely rare cases of provable no-fault vaccine injury. Countries that mandate childhood vaccination without providing no fault compensation schemes could be seen as abrogating the social contract. This is particularly important when public policies limit parental choice regarding whether to vaccinate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2843-2848
Number of pages6
JournalVaccine
Volume37
Issue number21
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 May 2019

Fingerprint

Compensation and Redress
Vaccination
Vaccines
vaccination
vaccines
Wounds and Injuries
childhood
Databases
public policy
Public Policy
Contracts
Internet
infectious diseases
Communicable Diseases
Publications

Cite this

@article{2dcc3fc58575401ab8ec7b37448000cf,
title = "Mandatory vaccination and no fault vaccine injury compensation schemes: An identification of country-level policies",
abstract = "Background: To prevent the spread of infectious diseases, governments have implemented a number of policies, including a range of mandatory vaccination policies. In addition, some governments have implemented no fault vaccine injury compensation schemes as a legal mechanism of recourse for individuals experiencing adverse events following vaccination. We aimed to identify countries with mandatory vaccination policies that also have no fault compensation schemes. Methods: To identify countries with mandatory childhood vaccination policies, we utilized existing publications, lists and databases, also conducting multiple country searches and policy detail verification. We then investigated compensation schemes for each country with childhood vaccination mandates, using an existing study and database/internet searches. Results: Of the 62 countries we identified with mandatory childhood vaccination policies, we found evidence that only 7 (11{\%}) had also implemented no fault compensation schemes. Conclusions: No-fault compensation schemes are one government approach to address unintended consequences of vaccination. Few countries have implemented these schemes, including those with mandatory vaccination policies. Mandatory vaccination invokes a strong need to protect those who fall victim to extremely rare cases of provable no-fault vaccine injury. Countries that mandate childhood vaccination without providing no fault compensation schemes could be seen as abrogating the social contract. This is particularly important when public policies limit parental choice regarding whether to vaccinate.",
keywords = "Adverse events, Compensation, Immunization, Mandatory, Policy, Social contract, Vaccination",
author = "Katie Attwell and Shevaun Drislane and Julie Leask",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.03.065",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "2843--2848",
journal = "Vaccine",
issn = "0264-410X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "21",

}

Mandatory vaccination and no fault vaccine injury compensation schemes : An identification of country-level policies. / Attwell, Katie; Drislane, Shevaun; Leask, Julie.

In: Vaccine, Vol. 37, No. 21, 09.05.2019, p. 2843-2848.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mandatory vaccination and no fault vaccine injury compensation schemes

T2 - An identification of country-level policies

AU - Attwell, Katie

AU - Drislane, Shevaun

AU - Leask, Julie

PY - 2019/5/9

Y1 - 2019/5/9

N2 - Background: To prevent the spread of infectious diseases, governments have implemented a number of policies, including a range of mandatory vaccination policies. In addition, some governments have implemented no fault vaccine injury compensation schemes as a legal mechanism of recourse for individuals experiencing adverse events following vaccination. We aimed to identify countries with mandatory vaccination policies that also have no fault compensation schemes. Methods: To identify countries with mandatory childhood vaccination policies, we utilized existing publications, lists and databases, also conducting multiple country searches and policy detail verification. We then investigated compensation schemes for each country with childhood vaccination mandates, using an existing study and database/internet searches. Results: Of the 62 countries we identified with mandatory childhood vaccination policies, we found evidence that only 7 (11%) had also implemented no fault compensation schemes. Conclusions: No-fault compensation schemes are one government approach to address unintended consequences of vaccination. Few countries have implemented these schemes, including those with mandatory vaccination policies. Mandatory vaccination invokes a strong need to protect those who fall victim to extremely rare cases of provable no-fault vaccine injury. Countries that mandate childhood vaccination without providing no fault compensation schemes could be seen as abrogating the social contract. This is particularly important when public policies limit parental choice regarding whether to vaccinate.

AB - Background: To prevent the spread of infectious diseases, governments have implemented a number of policies, including a range of mandatory vaccination policies. In addition, some governments have implemented no fault vaccine injury compensation schemes as a legal mechanism of recourse for individuals experiencing adverse events following vaccination. We aimed to identify countries with mandatory vaccination policies that also have no fault compensation schemes. Methods: To identify countries with mandatory childhood vaccination policies, we utilized existing publications, lists and databases, also conducting multiple country searches and policy detail verification. We then investigated compensation schemes for each country with childhood vaccination mandates, using an existing study and database/internet searches. Results: Of the 62 countries we identified with mandatory childhood vaccination policies, we found evidence that only 7 (11%) had also implemented no fault compensation schemes. Conclusions: No-fault compensation schemes are one government approach to address unintended consequences of vaccination. Few countries have implemented these schemes, including those with mandatory vaccination policies. Mandatory vaccination invokes a strong need to protect those who fall victim to extremely rare cases of provable no-fault vaccine injury. Countries that mandate childhood vaccination without providing no fault compensation schemes could be seen as abrogating the social contract. This is particularly important when public policies limit parental choice regarding whether to vaccinate.

KW - Adverse events

KW - Compensation

KW - Immunization

KW - Mandatory

KW - Policy

KW - Social contract

KW - Vaccination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064903429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.03.065

DO - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.03.065

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 2843

EP - 2848

JO - Vaccine

JF - Vaccine

SN - 0264-410X

IS - 21

ER -