Malaysia and Indonesia: a study of foreign policies with special reference to bilaterial relations

Nizar Yaakub

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Abstract

In the post-Cold War era, the 'special relationship' between Malaysia and Indonesia appears to have become not as cordial as during the 1970s-80s. In fact, it has been characterized more by conflict and rivalry than cooperation. Many issues have contributed to the tension namely, clash of personality between leaders, national political transformation, cross-border environmental concerns, illegal migrant workers, separatist movement, territorial disputes, transnational terrorism, and disputes over cultural rights. While examining those specific developments, this thesis organizes its analysis of Malaysian and Indonesian foreign policies, with special reference to their evolving bilateral relations, from a constructivist perspective. Constructivists believe that culture, ethnicity, elite/leadership, national identity, and religious beliefs are among the main factors which should be examined in order to better understand a state's behaviour in relation to other states in the international arena. Those non-material factors, which are ignored or under-studied in the leading international theories which mostly focus on military/economic power and the international system underpinned by balance of power, provide a useful interpretive framework to understand the cases of Malaysia and Indonesia. Deploying this constructivist perspective, this thesis examines and compares those factors' impact on Malaysian and Indonesian foreign policies in general, and on their conduct of bilateral relations in particular, in the post-Cold War era. Following a theoretical and background review (Chapter 1) and an empirical discussion of the foreign policies/relations of Indonesia and Malaysia (Chapter 2), other chapters will then present analysis from the prisms of elite/leadership (Chapter 3), the serumpun tradition (Chapter 4), nationalist sentiment (Chapter 5), and Islam (Chapter 6), before integrating those constructive factors for a final generalized assessment of how the many cor
LanguageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
StateUnpublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Indonesia
Malaysia
foreign policy
bilateral relations
cold war
elite
leadership
economic power
balance of power
migrant worker
international system
national identity
Islam
terrorism
personality
ethnicity
Military
leader

Cite this

@phdthesis{11cae913b8de45eab2f7fa1a1f377fa6,
title = "Malaysia and Indonesia: a study of foreign policies with special reference to bilaterial relations",
abstract = "In the post-Cold War era, the 'special relationship' between Malaysia and Indonesia appears to have become not as cordial as during the 1970s-80s. In fact, it has been characterized more by conflict and rivalry than cooperation. Many issues have contributed to the tension namely, clash of personality between leaders, national political transformation, cross-border environmental concerns, illegal migrant workers, separatist movement, territorial disputes, transnational terrorism, and disputes over cultural rights. While examining those specific developments, this thesis organizes its analysis of Malaysian and Indonesian foreign policies, with special reference to their evolving bilateral relations, from a constructivist perspective. Constructivists believe that culture, ethnicity, elite/leadership, national identity, and religious beliefs are among the main factors which should be examined in order to better understand a state's behaviour in relation to other states in the international arena. Those non-material factors, which are ignored or under-studied in the leading international theories which mostly focus on military/economic power and the international system underpinned by balance of power, provide a useful interpretive framework to understand the cases of Malaysia and Indonesia. Deploying this constructivist perspective, this thesis examines and compares those factors' impact on Malaysian and Indonesian foreign policies in general, and on their conduct of bilateral relations in particular, in the post-Cold War era. Following a theoretical and background review (Chapter 1) and an empirical discussion of the foreign policies/relations of Indonesia and Malaysia (Chapter 2), other chapters will then present analysis from the prisms of elite/leadership (Chapter 3), the serumpun tradition (Chapter 4), nationalist sentiment (Chapter 5), and Islam (Chapter 6), before integrating those constructive factors for a final generalized assessment of how the many cor",
keywords = "Malaysia, Foreign relations, Indonesia, Politics and government, 20th century, History, Foreign policy, Bilateral relations, Leaders, Serumpun, Nationalism, Islam",
author = "Nizar Yaakub",
year = "2009",
language = "English",

}

Malaysia and Indonesia: a study of foreign policies with special reference to bilaterial relations. / Yaakub, Nizar.

2009.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

TY - THES

T1 - Malaysia and Indonesia: a study of foreign policies with special reference to bilaterial relations

AU - Yaakub,Nizar

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - In the post-Cold War era, the 'special relationship' between Malaysia and Indonesia appears to have become not as cordial as during the 1970s-80s. In fact, it has been characterized more by conflict and rivalry than cooperation. Many issues have contributed to the tension namely, clash of personality between leaders, national political transformation, cross-border environmental concerns, illegal migrant workers, separatist movement, territorial disputes, transnational terrorism, and disputes over cultural rights. While examining those specific developments, this thesis organizes its analysis of Malaysian and Indonesian foreign policies, with special reference to their evolving bilateral relations, from a constructivist perspective. Constructivists believe that culture, ethnicity, elite/leadership, national identity, and religious beliefs are among the main factors which should be examined in order to better understand a state's behaviour in relation to other states in the international arena. Those non-material factors, which are ignored or under-studied in the leading international theories which mostly focus on military/economic power and the international system underpinned by balance of power, provide a useful interpretive framework to understand the cases of Malaysia and Indonesia. Deploying this constructivist perspective, this thesis examines and compares those factors' impact on Malaysian and Indonesian foreign policies in general, and on their conduct of bilateral relations in particular, in the post-Cold War era. Following a theoretical and background review (Chapter 1) and an empirical discussion of the foreign policies/relations of Indonesia and Malaysia (Chapter 2), other chapters will then present analysis from the prisms of elite/leadership (Chapter 3), the serumpun tradition (Chapter 4), nationalist sentiment (Chapter 5), and Islam (Chapter 6), before integrating those constructive factors for a final generalized assessment of how the many cor

AB - In the post-Cold War era, the 'special relationship' between Malaysia and Indonesia appears to have become not as cordial as during the 1970s-80s. In fact, it has been characterized more by conflict and rivalry than cooperation. Many issues have contributed to the tension namely, clash of personality between leaders, national political transformation, cross-border environmental concerns, illegal migrant workers, separatist movement, territorial disputes, transnational terrorism, and disputes over cultural rights. While examining those specific developments, this thesis organizes its analysis of Malaysian and Indonesian foreign policies, with special reference to their evolving bilateral relations, from a constructivist perspective. Constructivists believe that culture, ethnicity, elite/leadership, national identity, and religious beliefs are among the main factors which should be examined in order to better understand a state's behaviour in relation to other states in the international arena. Those non-material factors, which are ignored or under-studied in the leading international theories which mostly focus on military/economic power and the international system underpinned by balance of power, provide a useful interpretive framework to understand the cases of Malaysia and Indonesia. Deploying this constructivist perspective, this thesis examines and compares those factors' impact on Malaysian and Indonesian foreign policies in general, and on their conduct of bilateral relations in particular, in the post-Cold War era. Following a theoretical and background review (Chapter 1) and an empirical discussion of the foreign policies/relations of Indonesia and Malaysia (Chapter 2), other chapters will then present analysis from the prisms of elite/leadership (Chapter 3), the serumpun tradition (Chapter 4), nationalist sentiment (Chapter 5), and Islam (Chapter 6), before integrating those constructive factors for a final generalized assessment of how the many cor

KW - Malaysia

KW - Foreign relations

KW - Indonesia

KW - Politics and government

KW - 20th century

KW - History

KW - Foreign policy

KW - Bilateral relations

KW - Leaders

KW - Serumpun

KW - Nationalism

KW - Islam

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

ER -