Mainstreaming of ecosystem services as a rationale for ecological restoration in Australia

Virginia Matzek, Kerrie A. Wilson, Marit Kragt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Conservation biology and restoration ecology have historically focused on promoting biodiversity and safeguarding endangered species. However, the ecosystem services (ES) concept has given these fields a new, anthropocentric rationale: promoting human wellbeing. Here we investigate how the ES concept has penetrated decision making and public support for ecological restoration in Australia, by examining the national government's funding priorities, land managers’ project goals, and the public's willingness to pay for restoration. We find that national funding priorities and local project implementation have thoroughly mainstreamed the ES concept, and that the public is generally supportive of ES goals. More than half of projects awarded funding, and two-thirds of land managers’ implemented projects, had explicit ES goals. Among managers who participated in semi-structured interviews, 45% rated ES aims as at least as important as biodiversity aims in their projects. The public was more willing to donate to a restoration scenario that included ES than one that did not, and 41% of the public chose an ES as the preferred outcome of restoration. Across all groups, provisioning services were the least preferred ES outcome, compared to regulating or cultural services. Our results indicate that ES are now important rationales for restoration funding and implementation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-86
Number of pages8
JournalEcosystem Services
Volume35
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

ecological restoration
ecosystem service
ecosystem services
restoration
Ecosystem
funding
managers
Biodiversity
manager
biodiversity
restoration ecology
Endangered Species
Federal Government
willingness to pay
Ecology
endangered species
public support
decision making
interviews
Decision Making

Cite this

@article{eaedd964f76a4c33bdf480f283d5c51e,
title = "Mainstreaming of ecosystem services as a rationale for ecological restoration in Australia",
abstract = "Conservation biology and restoration ecology have historically focused on promoting biodiversity and safeguarding endangered species. However, the ecosystem services (ES) concept has given these fields a new, anthropocentric rationale: promoting human wellbeing. Here we investigate how the ES concept has penetrated decision making and public support for ecological restoration in Australia, by examining the national government's funding priorities, land managers’ project goals, and the public's willingness to pay for restoration. We find that national funding priorities and local project implementation have thoroughly mainstreamed the ES concept, and that the public is generally supportive of ES goals. More than half of projects awarded funding, and two-thirds of land managers’ implemented projects, had explicit ES goals. Among managers who participated in semi-structured interviews, 45{\%} rated ES aims as at least as important as biodiversity aims in their projects. The public was more willing to donate to a restoration scenario that included ES than one that did not, and 41{\%} of the public chose an ES as the preferred outcome of restoration. Across all groups, provisioning services were the least preferred ES outcome, compared to regulating or cultural services. Our results indicate that ES are now important rationales for restoration funding and implementation.",
keywords = "Conservation planning, Natural resource management, Prioritization, Stakeholders, Survey, Willingness to pay",
author = "Virginia Matzek and Wilson, {Kerrie A.} and Marit Kragt",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.11.005",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "79--86",
journal = "Ecosystem Services",
issn = "2212-0416",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Mainstreaming of ecosystem services as a rationale for ecological restoration in Australia. / Matzek, Virginia; Wilson, Kerrie A.; Kragt, Marit.

In: Ecosystem Services, Vol. 35, 01.02.2019, p. 79-86.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mainstreaming of ecosystem services as a rationale for ecological restoration in Australia

AU - Matzek, Virginia

AU - Wilson, Kerrie A.

AU - Kragt, Marit

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Conservation biology and restoration ecology have historically focused on promoting biodiversity and safeguarding endangered species. However, the ecosystem services (ES) concept has given these fields a new, anthropocentric rationale: promoting human wellbeing. Here we investigate how the ES concept has penetrated decision making and public support for ecological restoration in Australia, by examining the national government's funding priorities, land managers’ project goals, and the public's willingness to pay for restoration. We find that national funding priorities and local project implementation have thoroughly mainstreamed the ES concept, and that the public is generally supportive of ES goals. More than half of projects awarded funding, and two-thirds of land managers’ implemented projects, had explicit ES goals. Among managers who participated in semi-structured interviews, 45% rated ES aims as at least as important as biodiversity aims in their projects. The public was more willing to donate to a restoration scenario that included ES than one that did not, and 41% of the public chose an ES as the preferred outcome of restoration. Across all groups, provisioning services were the least preferred ES outcome, compared to regulating or cultural services. Our results indicate that ES are now important rationales for restoration funding and implementation.

AB - Conservation biology and restoration ecology have historically focused on promoting biodiversity and safeguarding endangered species. However, the ecosystem services (ES) concept has given these fields a new, anthropocentric rationale: promoting human wellbeing. Here we investigate how the ES concept has penetrated decision making and public support for ecological restoration in Australia, by examining the national government's funding priorities, land managers’ project goals, and the public's willingness to pay for restoration. We find that national funding priorities and local project implementation have thoroughly mainstreamed the ES concept, and that the public is generally supportive of ES goals. More than half of projects awarded funding, and two-thirds of land managers’ implemented projects, had explicit ES goals. Among managers who participated in semi-structured interviews, 45% rated ES aims as at least as important as biodiversity aims in their projects. The public was more willing to donate to a restoration scenario that included ES than one that did not, and 41% of the public chose an ES as the preferred outcome of restoration. Across all groups, provisioning services were the least preferred ES outcome, compared to regulating or cultural services. Our results indicate that ES are now important rationales for restoration funding and implementation.

KW - Conservation planning

KW - Natural resource management

KW - Prioritization

KW - Stakeholders

KW - Survey

KW - Willingness to pay

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057238006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.11.005

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.11.005

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 79

EP - 86

JO - Ecosystem Services

JF - Ecosystem Services

SN - 2212-0416

ER -