Macroalgae removal on coral reefs: realised ecosystem functions transcend biogeographic locations

Sterling B. Tebbett, Andrew S. Hoey, Martial Depczynski, Sharon Wismer, David R. Bellwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Coral reef ecosystems are at the forefront of biodiversity loss and climate change-mediated transformations. This is expected to have profound consequences for the functioning of these ecosystems. However, assessments of ecosystem function on reefs are often spatially limited, within biogeographic realms, or rely on presumed proxies such as traits. To address these shortcomings and assess the effects of biogeography and fish presence on the critical ecosystem function of macroalgal removal, we used assays of six algal genera across three reef habitats in two biogeographically distinct locations: Little Cayman in the Caribbean and Lizard Island on the Great Barrier Reef (GBR). Patterns of fish feeding and realised ecosystem function were strikingly similar between the two geographic locations, despite a threefold difference in the local diversity of nominally herbivorous fishes, a 2.4-fold difference in the diversity of fishes feeding and differences in the biogeographic history of the two locations. In both regions, a single species dominated the function: a surgeonfish, Naso unicornis, at the GBR location and, surprisingly, a triggerfish, Melichthys niger, at the Caribbean location. Both species, especially M. niger, were relatively rare, compared to other nominally herbivorous fishes, in censuses covering more than 14,000 m2 at each location. Our study provides novel insights into the critical function of macroalgal removal in hyperdiverse coral reef ecosystems, highlighting: (a) that function can transcend biogeographic, taxonomic and historical constraints; and (b) shortcomings in our assumptions regarding fish presence and realised ecosystem function on coral reefs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-214
JournalCoral Reefs
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2020

Fingerprint

ecosystem function
coral reefs
coral reef
macroalgae
ecosystems
fish
barrier reef
fish feeding
Great Barrier Reef
ecosystem
reef
reefs
ecozone
Balistidae
Naso
Acanthuridae
biogeography
lizard
removal
census

Cite this

Tebbett, S. B., Hoey, A. S., Depczynski, M., Wismer, S., & Bellwood, D. R. (2020). Macroalgae removal on coral reefs: realised ecosystem functions transcend biogeographic locations. Coral Reefs, 39(1), 203-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-019-01874-w
Tebbett, Sterling B. ; Hoey, Andrew S. ; Depczynski, Martial ; Wismer, Sharon ; Bellwood, David R. / Macroalgae removal on coral reefs : realised ecosystem functions transcend biogeographic locations. In: Coral Reefs. 2020 ; Vol. 39, No. 1. pp. 203-214.
@article{1c0f434c0b44424ebb12b12369da10d2,
title = "Macroalgae removal on coral reefs: realised ecosystem functions transcend biogeographic locations",
abstract = "Coral reef ecosystems are at the forefront of biodiversity loss and climate change-mediated transformations. This is expected to have profound consequences for the functioning of these ecosystems. However, assessments of ecosystem function on reefs are often spatially limited, within biogeographic realms, or rely on presumed proxies such as traits. To address these shortcomings and assess the effects of biogeography and fish presence on the critical ecosystem function of macroalgal removal, we used assays of six algal genera across three reef habitats in two biogeographically distinct locations: Little Cayman in the Caribbean and Lizard Island on the Great Barrier Reef (GBR). Patterns of fish feeding and realised ecosystem function were strikingly similar between the two geographic locations, despite a threefold difference in the local diversity of nominally herbivorous fishes, a 2.4-fold difference in the diversity of fishes feeding and differences in the biogeographic history of the two locations. In both regions, a single species dominated the function: a surgeonfish, Naso unicornis, at the GBR location and, surprisingly, a triggerfish, Melichthys niger, at the Caribbean location. Both species, especially M. niger, were relatively rare, compared to other nominally herbivorous fishes, in censuses covering more than 14,000 m2 at each location. Our study provides novel insights into the critical function of macroalgal removal in hyperdiverse coral reef ecosystems, highlighting: (a) that function can transcend biogeographic, taxonomic and historical constraints; and (b) shortcomings in our assumptions regarding fish presence and realised ecosystem function on coral reefs.",
keywords = "Caribbean, Ecosystem function, Fish, Functional redundancy, Great barrier reef, Herbivory",
author = "Tebbett, {Sterling B.} and Hoey, {Andrew S.} and Martial Depczynski and Sharon Wismer and Bellwood, {David R.}",
year = "2020",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00338-019-01874-w",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "203--214",
journal = "Coral Reefs",
issn = "0722-4028",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Tebbett, SB, Hoey, AS, Depczynski, M, Wismer, S & Bellwood, DR 2020, 'Macroalgae removal on coral reefs: realised ecosystem functions transcend biogeographic locations' Coral Reefs, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 203-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-019-01874-w

Macroalgae removal on coral reefs : realised ecosystem functions transcend biogeographic locations. / Tebbett, Sterling B.; Hoey, Andrew S.; Depczynski, Martial; Wismer, Sharon; Bellwood, David R.

In: Coral Reefs, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.02.2020, p. 203-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Macroalgae removal on coral reefs

T2 - realised ecosystem functions transcend biogeographic locations

AU - Tebbett, Sterling B.

AU - Hoey, Andrew S.

AU - Depczynski, Martial

AU - Wismer, Sharon

AU - Bellwood, David R.

PY - 2020/2/1

Y1 - 2020/2/1

N2 - Coral reef ecosystems are at the forefront of biodiversity loss and climate change-mediated transformations. This is expected to have profound consequences for the functioning of these ecosystems. However, assessments of ecosystem function on reefs are often spatially limited, within biogeographic realms, or rely on presumed proxies such as traits. To address these shortcomings and assess the effects of biogeography and fish presence on the critical ecosystem function of macroalgal removal, we used assays of six algal genera across three reef habitats in two biogeographically distinct locations: Little Cayman in the Caribbean and Lizard Island on the Great Barrier Reef (GBR). Patterns of fish feeding and realised ecosystem function were strikingly similar between the two geographic locations, despite a threefold difference in the local diversity of nominally herbivorous fishes, a 2.4-fold difference in the diversity of fishes feeding and differences in the biogeographic history of the two locations. In both regions, a single species dominated the function: a surgeonfish, Naso unicornis, at the GBR location and, surprisingly, a triggerfish, Melichthys niger, at the Caribbean location. Both species, especially M. niger, were relatively rare, compared to other nominally herbivorous fishes, in censuses covering more than 14,000 m2 at each location. Our study provides novel insights into the critical function of macroalgal removal in hyperdiverse coral reef ecosystems, highlighting: (a) that function can transcend biogeographic, taxonomic and historical constraints; and (b) shortcomings in our assumptions regarding fish presence and realised ecosystem function on coral reefs.

AB - Coral reef ecosystems are at the forefront of biodiversity loss and climate change-mediated transformations. This is expected to have profound consequences for the functioning of these ecosystems. However, assessments of ecosystem function on reefs are often spatially limited, within biogeographic realms, or rely on presumed proxies such as traits. To address these shortcomings and assess the effects of biogeography and fish presence on the critical ecosystem function of macroalgal removal, we used assays of six algal genera across three reef habitats in two biogeographically distinct locations: Little Cayman in the Caribbean and Lizard Island on the Great Barrier Reef (GBR). Patterns of fish feeding and realised ecosystem function were strikingly similar between the two geographic locations, despite a threefold difference in the local diversity of nominally herbivorous fishes, a 2.4-fold difference in the diversity of fishes feeding and differences in the biogeographic history of the two locations. In both regions, a single species dominated the function: a surgeonfish, Naso unicornis, at the GBR location and, surprisingly, a triggerfish, Melichthys niger, at the Caribbean location. Both species, especially M. niger, were relatively rare, compared to other nominally herbivorous fishes, in censuses covering more than 14,000 m2 at each location. Our study provides novel insights into the critical function of macroalgal removal in hyperdiverse coral reef ecosystems, highlighting: (a) that function can transcend biogeographic, taxonomic and historical constraints; and (b) shortcomings in our assumptions regarding fish presence and realised ecosystem function on coral reefs.

KW - Caribbean

KW - Ecosystem function

KW - Fish

KW - Functional redundancy

KW - Great barrier reef

KW - Herbivory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075862714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00338-019-01874-w

DO - 10.1007/s00338-019-01874-w

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 203

EP - 214

JO - Coral Reefs

JF - Coral Reefs

SN - 0722-4028

IS - 1

ER -