MACHO 96-LMC-2: Lensing of a binary source in the Large Magellanic Cloud and constraints on the lensing object

C. Alcock, R.A. Allsman, D.R. Alves, T.S. Axelrod, A.C. Becker, D.P. Bennett, K.H. Cook, A.J. Drake, K.C. Freeman, M. Geha, K. Griest, M.J. Lehner, S.L. Marshall, D. Minniti, C.A. Nelson, B.A. Peterson, P. Popowski, M.R. Pratt, Peter Quinn, C.W. StubbsW. Sutherland, A.B. Tomaney, T. Vandehei, D. Welch

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    32 Citations (Web of Science)

    Abstract

    We present photometry and analysis of the microlensing alert MACHO 96-LMC-2 (event LMC-14 in an earlier paper). This event was initially detected by the MACHO Alert System and subsequently monitored by the Global Microlensing Alert Network (GMAN). The similar to3% photometry provided by the GMAN follow-up effort reveals a periodic modulation in the light curve. We attribute this to binarity of the lensed source. Microlensing fits to a rotating binary source magnified by a single lens converge on two minima, separated by Delta chi (2) similar to 1. The most significant fit X1 predicts a primary which contributes similar to 100% of the light, a dark secondary, and an orbital period (T) of similar to 9.2 days. The second fit X2 yields a binary source with two stars of roughly equal mass and luminosity and T = 21.2 days. Observations made with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST)(18) resolve stellar neighbors which contribute to the MACHO object's baseline brightness. The actual lensed object appears to lie on the upper LMC main sequence. We estimate the mass of the primary component of the binary system, M similar to 2 M-.. This helps to determine the physical size of the orbiting system and allows a measurement of the lens proper motion. For the preferred model X1, we explore the range of dark companions by assuming 0.1 M-. and 1.4 M-. objects in models X1a and X1b, respectively. We find lens velocities projected to the LMC in these models of (v) over cap (X1a) = 18.3 +/- 3.1 km s(-1) and (v) over cap = 188 + 32 km s(-1). In both these cases, a likelihood analysis suggests an LMC lens is preferred over a Galactic halo lens, although only marginally so in model X1b. We also find (v) over cap (X2) = 39.6 +/- 6.1 km s(-1) where the likelihood for the lens location is strongly dominated by the LMC disk. In all cases, the reds mass is consistent with that of an M dwarf. Additional spectra of the lensed source system are necessary to further constrain and/or refine the derived properties of the lensing object. The LMC self-lensing rate contributed by 96-LMC-2 is consistent with model self-lensing rates. Thus, even if the lens is in the LMC disk, it does not rule out the possibility of Galactic halo microlenses altogether. Finally, we emphasize the unique capability of follow-up spectroscopic observations of known microlensed LMC stars, combined with the nondetection of binary source effects, to locate lenses in the Galactic halo.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)259-267
    JournalThe Astrophysical Journal
    Volume552
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2001

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'MACHO 96-LMC-2: Lensing of a binary source in the Large Magellanic Cloud and constraints on the lensing object'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this