Lung cancer among firefighters: Smoking-adjusted risk estimates in a pooled analysis of case-control studies

C. Bigert, P. Gustavsson, K. Straif, D. Taeger, B. Pesch, B. Kendzia, J. Schüz, I. Stücker, F. Guida, I. Brüske, H.E. Wichmann, A.C. Pesatori, M.T. Landi, N. Caporaso, L.A. Tse, I.T.S. Yu, J. Siemiatycki, J. Lavoué, L. Richiardi, D. MirabelliL. Simonato, K.H. Jöckel, W. Ahrens, H. Pohlabeln, A. Tardón, D. Zaridze, J.K. Field, A. Mannetje, N. Pearce, J. Mclaughlin, P. Demers, N. Szeszenia-Dabrowska, J. Lissowska, P. Rudnai, E. Fabianova, R.S. Dumitru, V. Bencko, L. Foretova, V. Janout, P. Boffetta, Susan Peters, R. Vermeulen, H. Kromhout, T. Brüning, A.C. Olsson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)


Copyright © 2016 American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore lung cancer risk among firefighters, with adjustment for smoking. Methods: We used pooled information from the SYNERGY project including 14 case-control studies conducted in Europe, Canada, New Zealand, and China, with lifetime work histories and smoking habits for 14,748 cases of lung cancer and 17,543 controls. We estimated odds ratios by unconditional logistic regression with adjustment for smoking and having ever been employed in a job known to present an excess risk of lung cancer. Results: There was no increased lung cancer risk overall or by specific cell type among firefighters (n=190), neither before nor after smoking adjustment. We observed no significant exposure-response relationship in terms of work duration. Conclusions: We found no evidence of an excess lung cancer risk related to occupational exposure as a firefighter.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1137-1143
JournalJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Lung cancer among firefighters: Smoking-adjusted risk estimates in a pooled analysis of case-control studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this