Levola Hengelo BV v Smilde Foods BV: The Hard Work of Defining a Copyright Work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Court of Justice of the European Union's judgement in Levola Hengelo BV v Smilde Foods BV ruled that the taste of food cannot be protected as a copyright work under EU copyright law. This note describes the issues in the primary dispute concerning the claim of copyright in the taste of cheese, the reasoning of Advocate General M. Wathelet who advised the CJEU, and the reasoning of the CJEU in its broad concurrence with the AG. It then critiques the CJEU's judgement, which is surprisingly brief, considering the gravity of the question, which probes the boundaries of the copyright work under EU law. The note explains the many opportunities that were overlooked by the court in its brief judgement, attempts to unravel some of the more ambiguous aspects of the judgement, and assesses the merit and utility of the court's primary pronouncement that a copyright work must be objectively identifiable.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)936–950
Number of pages15
JournalModern Law Review
Volume82
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Levola Hengelo BV v Smilde Foods BV: The Hard Work of Defining a Copyright Work'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this