Legal pluralism? indigenous rights as legal constructs

Chris Thornhill, Carina Calabria, Rodrigo Cespedes, Dominic Dagbanja, Elizabeth O'Loughlin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

This article sets out a sociological critique of the theories of legal pluralism that underpin contemporary constructions of Indigenous rights. It argues that pluralistic theories of Indigenous rights, which see Indigenous rights as challenging the legal orders of nation-states, are based in simplified analyses of the construction of such rights, and they fail to account for the subjects that lay claim to indigeneity and the relation between such subjects and national legal systems. To explain this, the article reconstructs primary patterns of Indigenous rights law in global international law, regional international law, and municipal law in Latin America and Africa. Against standard pluralistic approaches, this article argues that we need to adopt a sociological model based in world citizenship, which depends on relatively autonomous legal functions, to understand the growth of Indigenous rights. Central to this model is the claim that the imputation of Indigenous rights extends the reach of domestic legal systems and that it is closely linked to a process in which the national legal system, supported by global legal norms, penetrates more deeply and more inclusively into national society.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)440-493
Number of pages54
JournalUniversity of Toronto Law Journal
Volume68
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

legal system
pluralism
international law
legal norm
legal order
Law
nation state
Latin America
citizenship

Cite this

Thornhill, Chris ; Calabria, Carina ; Cespedes, Rodrigo ; Dagbanja, Dominic ; O'Loughlin, Elizabeth. / Legal pluralism? indigenous rights as legal constructs. In: University of Toronto Law Journal. 2018 ; Vol. 68, No. 3. pp. 440-493.
@article{b5906d6e46c64efcaab2a6e0c21cae28,
title = "Legal pluralism? indigenous rights as legal constructs",
abstract = "This article sets out a sociological critique of the theories of legal pluralism that underpin contemporary constructions of Indigenous rights. It argues that pluralistic theories of Indigenous rights, which see Indigenous rights as challenging the legal orders of nation-states, are based in simplified analyses of the construction of such rights, and they fail to account for the subjects that lay claim to indigeneity and the relation between such subjects and national legal systems. To explain this, the article reconstructs primary patterns of Indigenous rights law in global international law, regional international law, and municipal law in Latin America and Africa. Against standard pluralistic approaches, this article argues that we need to adopt a sociological model based in world citizenship, which depends on relatively autonomous legal functions, to understand the growth of Indigenous rights. Central to this model is the claim that the imputation of Indigenous rights extends the reach of domestic legal systems and that it is closely linked to a process in which the national legal system, supported by global legal norms, penetrates more deeply and more inclusively into national society.",
keywords = "Citizenship, Indigenous rights, International human rights law, Legal pluralism, Sociology of law",
author = "Chris Thornhill and Carina Calabria and Rodrigo Cespedes and Dominic Dagbanja and Elizabeth O'Loughlin",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3138/utlj.2017-0062",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "440--493",
journal = "University of Toronto Law Journal",
issn = "0042-0220",
publisher = "University of Toronto Press",
number = "3",

}

Thornhill, C, Calabria, C, Cespedes, R, Dagbanja, D & O'Loughlin, E 2018, 'Legal pluralism? indigenous rights as legal constructs' University of Toronto Law Journal, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 440-493. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj.2017-0062

Legal pluralism? indigenous rights as legal constructs. / Thornhill, Chris; Calabria, Carina; Cespedes, Rodrigo; Dagbanja, Dominic; O'Loughlin, Elizabeth.

In: University of Toronto Law Journal, Vol. 68, No. 3, 01.06.2018, p. 440-493.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legal pluralism? indigenous rights as legal constructs

AU - Thornhill, Chris

AU - Calabria, Carina

AU - Cespedes, Rodrigo

AU - Dagbanja, Dominic

AU - O'Loughlin, Elizabeth

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - This article sets out a sociological critique of the theories of legal pluralism that underpin contemporary constructions of Indigenous rights. It argues that pluralistic theories of Indigenous rights, which see Indigenous rights as challenging the legal orders of nation-states, are based in simplified analyses of the construction of such rights, and they fail to account for the subjects that lay claim to indigeneity and the relation between such subjects and national legal systems. To explain this, the article reconstructs primary patterns of Indigenous rights law in global international law, regional international law, and municipal law in Latin America and Africa. Against standard pluralistic approaches, this article argues that we need to adopt a sociological model based in world citizenship, which depends on relatively autonomous legal functions, to understand the growth of Indigenous rights. Central to this model is the claim that the imputation of Indigenous rights extends the reach of domestic legal systems and that it is closely linked to a process in which the national legal system, supported by global legal norms, penetrates more deeply and more inclusively into national society.

AB - This article sets out a sociological critique of the theories of legal pluralism that underpin contemporary constructions of Indigenous rights. It argues that pluralistic theories of Indigenous rights, which see Indigenous rights as challenging the legal orders of nation-states, are based in simplified analyses of the construction of such rights, and they fail to account for the subjects that lay claim to indigeneity and the relation between such subjects and national legal systems. To explain this, the article reconstructs primary patterns of Indigenous rights law in global international law, regional international law, and municipal law in Latin America and Africa. Against standard pluralistic approaches, this article argues that we need to adopt a sociological model based in world citizenship, which depends on relatively autonomous legal functions, to understand the growth of Indigenous rights. Central to this model is the claim that the imputation of Indigenous rights extends the reach of domestic legal systems and that it is closely linked to a process in which the national legal system, supported by global legal norms, penetrates more deeply and more inclusively into national society.

KW - Citizenship

KW - Indigenous rights

KW - International human rights law

KW - Legal pluralism

KW - Sociology of law

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052101344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3138/utlj.2017-0062

DO - 10.3138/utlj.2017-0062

M3 - Review article

VL - 68

SP - 440

EP - 493

JO - University of Toronto Law Journal

JF - University of Toronto Law Journal

SN - 0042-0220

IS - 3

ER -