Leaf phosphorus allocation patterns and photosynthetic phosphorus-use-efficiency in phosphorus-limited conditions

L-G. Li, Q-M. Wang, J. Pang, N-J Ma, J. He, H. Lambers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The roles of leaf phosphorus (P) fractions in leaf photosynthetic P-use-efficiency (PPUE) under low soil P, and differences, if any, between legume and non-legume species are largely unknown. We investigated 24 crop species, 13 legumes and 11 non-legumes, for leaf PPUE and P acquisition strategies under low plant-available soil P. Legume species had a lower PPUE (38%), photosynthetic rate per area (Aarea; 38%) and per mass (Amass; 32%), but higher leaf P concentration (19%) than non-legume species. Legume species had a significantly higher nucleic acid P concentration, while percentage of nucleic acid P was higher, but percentage of inorganic P and metabolite P were lower in legumes than in non-legumes. Legume species had significantly greater total root length and carboxylate release than non-legume species. PPUE showed a positive correlation with Aarea, Amass, percentage of lipid P and metabolite P, but a negative correlation with concentrations of inorganic P, nucleic acid P, and leaf P. There was contrasting P-use-efficiency and P acquisition capacities between legume and non-legume species; high photosynthesis rate was associated with a high metabolite P concentration, but low nucleic acid P concentrations were related to a high PPUE. A P mining strategy was associated with a high leaf P concentration and low PPUE. This study provides insight into P use and P acquisition strategies and their correlations among 24 crop species grown under low plant-available soil P conditions.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages12
JournalPlant Biology
Early online dateSept 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Sept 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Leaf phosphorus allocation patterns and photosynthetic phosphorus-use-efficiency in phosphorus-limited conditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this