Abstract
Combinatorics on words began more than a century ago with a demonstration that an infinitely long string with no repetitions could be constructed on an alphabet of only three letters. Computing all the repetitions (such as . . . TTT . . . or . . .CGACGA. . . ) in a given string x of length n is one of the oldest and most important problems of computational stringology, requiring O(n log n) time in the worst case. About a dozen years ago, it was discovered that repetitions can be computed as a by-product of the T(n)-time computation of all the maximal periodicities or runs in x. However, even though the computation is linear, it is also brute force: global data structures, such as the suffix array, the longest common prefix array and the Lempel-Ziv factorization, need to be computed in a preprocessing phase. Furthermore, all of this effort is required despite the fact that the expected number of runs in a string is generally a small fraction of the string length. In this paper, I explore the possibility that repetitions (perhaps also other regularities in strings) can be computed in a manner commensurate with the size of the output. © 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 10pp |
| Journal | Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences |
| Volume | 372 |
| Issue number | 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Large-scale detection of repetitions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver